draw logical inferences

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "draw logical inferences" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the process of reasoning or deducing conclusions based on available information or evidence. Example: "After analyzing the data, we can draw logical inferences about the trends in consumer behavior."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Additional Learning Network Resources Common Core ELA Anchor Standardss, 6-12 Reading 1. Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.

The New York Times

For instance, students could: Common Core ELA Anchor Standards, 6-12 Reading 1. Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.

The New York Times

More Resources Common Core English Language Arts Anchor Standards CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.R.1 CCSS.ELA-Literacy.CCRA.R.1 Readthe text says explicloselynd to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evideterminen whating or speaking thesupportextnclusayss drawn from thexplicitly

The New York Times

Common Core ELA Anchor Standards, 6-12: Reading 1. Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.

The New York Times

Ask them to think about the following questions: Common Core ELA Anchor Standards, 6-12 Reading 1. Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.

The New York Times

These lesson ideas meet the Common Core Anchor Standards and McREL Standards as follows: Common Core Anchor Standards, 6-12 Reading 1. Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.

The New York Times

Standards | This unit meets the Common Core State Standards and McREL Standards as follows: Common Core Anchor Standards, 6-12: Reading 1. Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.

The New York Times

Other ways to broaden the canon with nonfiction (reprinted from a 2010 lesson on nonfiction created before the era of the Common Core): Common Core ELA Anchor Standards, 6-12 Reading 1. Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.

The New York Times

Going Further | Use the following ideas to explore related topics in more depth: Common Core ELA Anchor Standards, 6-12 Reading 1. Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.

The New York Times

Here are some ways you might teach with them: China today is a place where: Common Core ELA Standards, 6-12 Reading 1. Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text.

The New York Times

This resource may be used to address the academic standards listed below. 1 Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text. 2 Determine central ideas or themes of a text and analyze their development; summarize the key supporting details and ideas.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "draw logical inferences", ensure that the evidence or premises upon which the inferences are based are clearly stated. This enhances the credibility and understandability of your reasoning.

Common error

Avoid presenting inferences as absolute facts without sufficient supporting evidence. Qualify your inferences with phrases like "it is likely that" or "it suggests that" to acknowledge the inherent uncertainty.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "draw logical inferences" functions as a verb phrase, describing the action of forming conclusions based on reason and evidence. It typically appears within a clause or sentence, indicating the process of reasoning from premises to a conclusion, as confirmed by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

30%

Encyclopedias

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

10%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "draw logical inferences" is a grammatically correct way to describe the process of forming conclusions based on reasoning and evidence. While Ludwig AI indicates it's not exceedingly common, the phrase is suitable for various contexts, from scientific writing to news reporting. Alternatives like "make reasoned conclusions" or "derive rational deductions" can be used depending on the specific nuances you want to convey. When using this phrase, ensure you clearly articulate the evidence supporting your inferences to enhance clarity and credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

make reasoned conclusions

Focuses on the rationality and justification behind the conclusions reached.

derive rational deductions

Emphasizes the process of logically deriving conclusions from a set of premises.

reach sound judgments

Highlights the quality and validity of the judgments made through logical reasoning.

formulate coherent insights

Stresses the clarity and logical consistency of the insights gained.

deduce plausible implications

Focuses on the act of deducing and the reasonableness of the implications drawn.

infer reasonable outcomes

Highlights the process of inferring and the justifiability of the predicted outcomes.

extrapolate valid assumptions

Emphasizes the act of extrapolating and the validity of the underlying assumptions.

develop informed perspectives

Stresses the knowledge-based and well-considered nature of the perspectives formed.

construct logical arguments

Focuses on building well-reasoned and logically sound arguments.

assess evidence-based viewpoints

Highlights the process of evaluating evidence to form a viewpoint.

FAQs

How can I use "draw logical inferences" in a sentence?

You can use "draw logical inferences" to describe the process of reaching conclusions based on reasoning and available information. For example: "After analyzing the data, we can "draw logical inferences" about the trends in consumer behavior."

What are some alternatives to "draw logical inferences"?

Alternatives include "make reasoned conclusions", "derive rational deductions", or "reach sound judgments" depending on the specific context.

What's the difference between "draw logical inferences" and "make assumptions"?

"Draw logical inferences" implies a process of reasoning based on evidence, whereas "make assumptions" suggests accepting something as true without proof. Inferences are more grounded in available information, while assumptions may be speculative.

Is it better to "draw logical inferences" or "gather more data"?

It depends on the situation. Drawing inferences is useful when immediate decisions are needed based on available information. Gathering more data is preferable when time and resources allow for a more comprehensive and accurate analysis.