does not set

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "does not set" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to indicate that something is not established, determined, or fixed. Example: "The current policy does not set any specific guidelines for remote work."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The sun does not "set".

The New York Times

He does not set a moral tone.

The New York Times - Sports

"Ticketmaster does not set prices," he said.

The New York Times

"Live Nation does not set ticket prices.

The New York Times

The bill does not set pay limits.

The New York Times

He does not set standards; he is the standard.

The New York Times

Yet, unlike many, he does not set about legislating history.

The Economist

The Florida law does not set an I.Q.

The New York Times

Medicare does not set or negotiate prices for the implants.

The New York Times

Idowu does not set target distances for himself.

The Guardian - Sport

The declaration does not set a firm date.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "does not set", ensure the context clearly indicates what is not being established. For example, specify "The policy does not set any specific requirements" instead of just "The policy does not set".

Common error

Avoid ambiguity by clearly stating what is being negated. Saying something "does not set limits" is different from saying it "sets no limits". The former suggests a lack of setting, while the latter emphasizes the absence of limits.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "does not set" functions as a negative verb phrase. It indicates the absence of an action, specifically the act of establishing, defining, or determining something. As Ludwig confirms, the phrase is both correct and usable. Examples in Ludwig show it being used across varied contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

69%

Science

20%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "does not set" is a grammatically correct and widely used negative verb phrase. As indicated by Ludwig, it serves to negate the action of establishing, defining, or determining something. It's prevalent in News & Media and Scientific contexts, demonstrating its adaptability. When using "does not set", clarity is key: explicitly state what isn't being established to avoid ambiguity. Common alternatives include ""does not define"" and ""fails to establish"". The choice of alternative depends on the specific context and desired nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

fails to establish

Indicates a lack of success in creating or proving something.

does not determine

Focuses on the absence of influence or control over an outcome.

does not define

Emphasizes the lack of a clear and precise meaning or boundary.

refrains from establishing

Highlights a conscious decision to not create or initiate.

avoids setting

Suggests an intentional act to prevent something from being established.

does not initiate

Highlights the absence of a starting action or process.

neglects to establish

Emphasizes a failure to create or set up something necessary.

lacks the ability to set

Indicates an absence of capability in creating something.

is not designed to set

Focuses on absence of a feature intended for determining something.

is unable to establish

Highlights the impossibility of creating or proving something.

FAQs

How can I use "does not set" in a sentence?

Use "does not set" to indicate that something fails to establish or define a specific value, standard, or precedent. For example, "This law "does not set" a minimum wage".

What are some alternatives to "does not set"?

Alternatives include "does not define", "fails to establish", or "does not determine". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "does not set any limits" or "sets no limits"?

Both are grammatically correct, but "sets no limits" is often considered more concise and emphatic. However, ""does not set" any limits" might be preferred for clarity in certain contexts.

What's the difference between "does not set" and "does not follow"?

"Does not set" indicates a failure to establish or create something, while "does not follow" implies a deviation from a prescribed path or instruction. They have distinct meanings and usages.