does not introduced

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "does not introduced" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "does not introduce"? You can use "does not introduce" when stating that something or someone fails to present or make known a particular subject or idea. Example: "The report does not introduce any new findings that could change our understanding of the issue."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Raman studies shows that ion irradiation process does not introduced any additional defects in GO.

Carbon

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

The channel is ideal and does not introduce errors.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Hence, it does not introduce additional processing complexity and delay.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Therefore, the new framework does not introduce extra computation delay.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

(i) The ideal channel does not introduce errors.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The presence of an environment does not introduce new dynamics.

EPJ Quantum Technology

It does not introduce a general obligation to monitor content".

TechCrunch

Because GDPR does not introduce privacy rules to the region.

TechCrunch

In doing so, it is important that it does not introduce systematic biases to the result.

Advances in Space Research

The handling of the infinite domain does not introduce any significant overhead.

Journal of Computational Physics

Therefore, the constitutive model does not introduce constitutive mesh dependency on the solution.

Composites Part B: Engineering

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the correct past participle form of the verb "introduce", which is "introduced" with the auxiliary verb "has/have/had", or "introduce" with the auxiliary verb "does/do/did". For example, use "does not introduce" instead of "does not introduced".

Common error

Avoid using the base form of a verb after "does not". Always ensure you use the base form of the verb, such as "introduce", not the past participle form, such as "introduced", in constructions like "does not introduce".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "does not introduced" is intended to function as a verb phrase expressing negation. However, Ludwig AI indicates this construction is grammatically incorrect. The auxiliary verb "does" requires the base form of the verb, not the past participle.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "does not introduced" is grammatically incorrect. The auxiliary verb "does" requires the base form of the verb, "introduce", not the past participle, "introduced". Therefore, the correct form is "does not introduce". Ludwig AI flags this as an error. While some sources may use the incorrect form, it's essential to use the grammatically correct version in writing and speech. Alternatives include "fails to introduce" or "does not present", depending on the intended meaning. Remember to use "does not introduce" instead. It's a common mistake, but ensuring correct grammar enhances clarity and credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

does not introduce

Replaces "introduced" with the correct form of the verb "introduce".

does not present

Substitutes "introduce" with "present" offering a slightly different nuance.

fails to introduce

Uses "fails to" to emphasize the lack of introduction.

does not offer

Replaces "introduce" with "offer" changing the verb but keeping a similar meaning.

does not include

Changes "introduce" to "include", focusing on absence of inclusion.

omits

Uses a single verb "omits" instead of the phrase.

leaves out

Uses the phrasal verb "leaves out" conveying omission.

excludes

Employs "excludes" for a more formal tone than "leaves out".

does not bring up

Replaces "introduce" with "bring up", focusing on not raising a topic.

skips

Uses "skips" to imply a deliberate omission.

FAQs

What is the correct form, "does not introduce" or "does not introduced"?

"Does not introduce" is the correct grammatical form. The auxiliary verb "does" requires the base form of the verb, which is "introduce".

How can I use "does not introduce" in a sentence?

Use "does not introduce" to indicate that something or someone does not present or make known a particular subject, idea, or element. For example: "The new evidence does not introduce any new information."

What are some alternatives to the phrase "does not introduce"?

Alternatives include "fails to introduce", "does not present", or simply "omits", depending on the intended meaning.

Is "does not introduced" ever correct?

No, "does not introduced" is not grammatically correct in standard English. It's a common error but should be avoided in formal writing.