does not identify

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "does not identify" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing something that fails to recognize or specify a particular subject or detail. Example: "The report does not identify the key factors contributing to the decline in sales."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That does not identify the year.

Yale University

The report does not identify the recipients of the missiles.

The New York Times

The report does not identify any apparent criminal activity.

The New York Times

And no, she does not identify with Samantha.

The New York Times

The indictment does not identify the double agent.

The New York Times

The FAA's data does not identify the pilots by name.

The Washington Post

The report does not identify any of the 96 athletes.

The New York Times - Sports

The memo does not identify any of the 25 people.

The New York Times

The group does not identify the source of the emails.

The Washington Post

Incredibly, the letter does not identify the alleged criminal activity.

The New York Times

The agency does not identify who filed a complaint.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "does not identify", ensure the sentence clearly states what is not being identified and why it's relevant. This provides context and prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "does not identify" excessively in passive constructions, such as "the problem is not identified". Instead, opt for active voice: "the report does not identify the problem". This makes your writing more direct and engaging.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "does not identify" functions as a predicate in a sentence, indicating that a subject lacks the ability or action of recognizing or specifying something. Ludwig examples show it frequently used to describe limitations in reports, studies, or systems.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

63%

Science

21%

Academia

4%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "does not identify" is a versatile expression used to indicate a lack of recognition or specification, particularly in reports, studies, and systems. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and wide applicability across various registers. While "does not specify" and "fails to specify" serve as viable alternatives, "does not identify" maintains a neutral tone, commonly found in news media, science, and academic contexts. Remember to use it actively for direct and engaging writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

does not specify

Neutral alternative, focusing on the absence of specific details.

fails to specify

Emphasizes a lack of detail or precision in providing information.

does not pinpoint

Focuses on the lack of precision in locating or defining something.

cannot determine

Highlights the inability to ascertain something based on available information.

does not clarify

Indicates a failure to make something clearer or more understandable.

does not detect

Suggests an inability to find or notice something, often in a technical context.

leaves undefined

Highlights that something remains without a clear definition.

omits to mention

Focuses on the absence of reference or inclusion of an item or detail.

makes no reference to

Emphasizes the complete absence of mention regarding the item.

sidesteps the issue of

Highlights a deliberate attempt to evade or omit the subject.

FAQs

How can I use "does not identify" in a sentence?

You can use "does not identify" to indicate a lack of specification or recognition. For example, "The report "does not identify" the source of the error" or "The software "does not identify" the user's location".

What are some alternatives to "does not identify"?

Alternatives include "fails to specify", "does not specify", "cannot determine", and "does not detect". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "does not identify" or "fails to identify"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct. "Fails to identify" might imply a stronger sense of inadequacy or expectation than "does not identify". Choose the phrase that best fits the intended tone and context.

What's the difference between "does not identify" and "does not specify"?

"Does not identify" implies a general lack of recognition or naming. "Does not specify" suggests a lack of detailed or precise information. For example, a report might "not identify" a suspect, but it might "not specify" the exact amount of money involved.