does not contest

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "does not contest" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal or formal contexts to indicate that someone is not disputing or challenging a claim or statement. Example: "The defendant does not contest the charges brought against him, indicating a willingness to accept the consequences."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

44 human-written examples

Williams does not contest that interpretation.

The New York Times - Sports

In any event, Intervest seemingly does not contest the point.

Harvard University

Mr. Tarloff does not contest the claim that he killed Dr. Faughey, 56.

The New York Times

In his brief to the justices, Mr Heien does not "contest the legality of this practice".

The Economist

A stipulation means Manafort's defense does not contest that piece of evidence.

The Washington Post

Holtzclaw does not contest that he encountered the women, but he maintains his innocence.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

16 human-written examples

In his exhortation, he doesn't contest the fact that global capitalism is uniquely productive.

The New Yorker

She did not contest them.

The New York Times - Magazine

Osborne did not contest this.

The Guardian

Note: Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, and Fred Thompson did not contest the poll.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Darnell did not contest most of these facts.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "does not contest", ensure that the context is appropriate for its formal tone. It's suitable for legal documents, academic papers, and official statements.

Common error

Avoid using "does not contest" in casual conversation or informal writing. The phrase can sound overly formal or stilted in everyday contexts; simpler alternatives like "agrees" or "doesn't disagree" are more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "does not contest" functions as a verbal phrase indicating a lack of opposition or challenge to a statement, claim, or fact. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and frequently used. Examples show it often appears in legal and formal contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

33%

Wiki

6%

Less common in

Science

2%

Formal & Business

9%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "does not contest" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression that indicates a deliberate lack of opposition or challenge. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it appears most commonly in news and media and academic contexts, suggesting a formal or neutral register. While alternatives like "does not dispute" or "agrees with" may be suitable in some cases, "does not contest" carries a specific nuance of strategic acceptance, making it particularly useful in legal, formal, and professional settings. Understanding its function and appropriate contexts ensures effective and precise communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

does not dispute

Replaces "contest" with "dispute", implying a lack of disagreement.

does not challenge

Substitutes "contest" with "challenge", suggesting an absence of active opposition.

does not deny

Replaces "contest" with "deny", indicating an admission or acknowledgement of a fact.

does not refute

Substitutes "contest" with "refute", meaning there is no attempt to prove something is false.

does not object to

Replaces "contest" with "object to", implying a lack of formal opposition.

concedes

A shorter, more direct replacement implying acceptance of a point.

acknowledges

Indicates recognition or acceptance of something, similar to not contesting.

accepts

Implies agreement or approval, conveying a lack of opposition.

agrees with

Directly states agreement, contrasting with the more passive 'does not contest'.

does not argue against

Rephrases as a lack of argumentation rather than a lack of contesting.

FAQs

How can I use "does not contest" in a sentence?

The phrase "does not contest" is typically used to indicate that a party is not challenging or disputing a particular claim or statement. For example: "The defendant "does not contest" the evidence presented by the prosecution".

What are some alternatives to "does not contest"?

Alternatives to "does not contest" include phrases such as "does not dispute", "does not challenge", or simply "agrees with", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to say "does not contest" or "agrees with"?

"Does not contest" is more formal and implies a deliberate decision not to dispute something, often in a legal or formal setting. "Agrees with" is more general and suggests simple agreement. The best choice depends on the context and the level of formality required.

What's the difference between "does not dispute" and "does not contest"?

While both phrases indicate a lack of opposition, "does not contest" often carries a slightly more formal or legal connotation. "Does not dispute" is generally more neutral and can be used in a broader range of contexts, though the difference is subtle.