does not contend

USAGE SUMMARY

"does not contend" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to someone or something declining to argue a point or position. For example, "The defendant does not contend that he is innocent."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

54 human-written examples

Appellee does not contend otherwise.

Cornell University

Bragg does not contend that general jurisdiction exists over Rosedale.

Harvard University

The state does not contend that he is mentally ill.

The New York Times

It is a surprise now when Woods does not contend.

The New York Times - Sports

The Government does not contend that only ownership of the premises may confer standing.

Cornell University

Plaintiff does not contend defendant or any of its employees were parties to the crime.

Harvard University

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

6 human-written examples

Tournaments in which he did not contend, or did not play in, averaged a 3.0.

The New York Times - Sports

Plaintiffs do not contend that in-home use infringes their copyright.

Cornell University

The Federal Circuit recognized this, and College Savings and the United States do not contend otherwise.

Cornell University

Critics of the "weighted" state boards do not contend that such boards are entirely unproductive.

The New York Times

The government did not contend that Snepp's book contained any classified material.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "does not contend", ensure the context clearly indicates what specific point or claim is not being argued. Clarity prevents misinterpretation.

Common error

Avoid using "does not contend" when you actually mean "disagrees with". The former implies a lack of argument, while the latter implies active opposition.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "does not contend" primarily functions as a verbal phrase indicating a lack of assertion or argument. As Ludwig AI confirms, it signifies that a subject is not actively claiming or disputing a particular point. Examples show it used in legal, academic, and journalistic contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

40%

News & Media

40%

Science

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "does not contend" is a versatile expression used to indicate a lack of argument or assertion regarding a specific point. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely accepted, predominantly appearing in academic, news media, and scientific contexts. It serves to convey neutrality or a non-oppositional stance, clarifying the scope of discussion. When using "does not contend", ensure the specific point not being argued is clearly defined, and avoid substituting it for stronger terms like "disagrees". Consider using alternative phrases such as "does not argue", "does not assert", or "does not claim" to subtly adjust the conveyed meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

does not argue

Replaces "contend" with "argue", maintaining the core meaning of not presenting a case or viewpoint.

does not assert

Substitutes "contend" with "assert", focusing on the absence of a strong declaration or claim.

does not maintain

Uses "maintain" instead of "contend", highlighting the lack of upholding a particular position.

does not claim

Replaces "contend" with "claim", focusing on the absence of an assertion of truth.

does not allege

Substitutes "contend" with "allege", emphasizing the lack of a formal accusation or assertion.

does not suggest

Uses "suggest" instead of "contend", indicating a weaker form of assertion or argument is not being made.

does not posit

Replaces "contend" with "posit", which means to suggest or assume as a fact or basis for reasoning, focusing on the absence of this.

does not submit

Substitutes "contend" with "submit", highlighting the lack of formal presentation of an argument.

does not propose

Uses "propose" instead of "contend", emphasizing the lack of suggesting something for consideration or acceptance.

offers no argument

Completely rephrases to focus on the absence of any argumentative presentation.

FAQs

How can I use "does not contend" in a sentence?

Use "does not contend" to indicate that someone is not arguing or claiming a specific point. For example, "The defendant "does not contend" that he was unaware of the law" means the defendant isn't arguing he didn't know the law.

What are some alternatives to "does not contend"?

Alternatives to "does not contend" include "does not argue", "does not assert", or "does not claim". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it more formal to use "does not contend" or "does not argue"?

"Does not contend" is generally considered more formal than "does not argue". "Contend" carries a slightly more elevated tone, suitable for legal or academic contexts, while "argue" is more common in everyday conversation.

What is the difference between "does not contend" and "agrees"?

"Does not contend" implies a lack of opposition to a point, whereas "agrees" indicates active support for that point. Someone who "does not contend" may simply be neutral or undecided, while someone who "agrees" is in favor.