does not contained

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "does not contained" is not correct in English.
The correct form should be "does not contain." You can use it when stating that something is absent or not included in a particular context. Example: "The report does not contain any errors, which is impressive given the complexity of the data."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

But (S_4) does not contained a dihedral group of order 12 and we have that (|H|=6).

Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences

Presence of N and H in the drug loaded of CaCO3 nanocrystal comfirm the interclation of drug into the nanocrystal, since pure or unloaded calcium carbonate does not contained such elements.

BioMed Research International

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

This post does NOT contain spoilers.

The New Yorker

It does not contain extraordinary measures.

The Economist

The capsicum itself does not contain capsaicin.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

The metal bob does not contain sand.

The Guardian

Mr. Crichton does not contain the reader.

The New York Times - Style

And no, tequila does not contain worms.

The New York Times - Food

Grapefruit does not contain the enzyme itself.

The New York Times

It does not contain the preservative.

The New York Times

Moreover, it does not contain moving parts.

Engineering Structures

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the correct form of the verb "contain", which is "contain" after "does not". For example, say "The report does not contain errors" instead of "The report does not contained errors".

Common error

Avoid using the past participle "contained" after "does not". The correct structure requires the base form of the verb, which is "contain". "Contained" is typically used in passive voice constructions or as an adjective.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "does not contained" functions as a verb phrase attempting to express negation. However, as Ludwig AI points out, it is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "does not contain".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "does not contained" is a grammatically incorrect construction. Ludwig AI highlights that the correct form is ""does not contain"". While the intention is to express the absence of something, the improper grammar undermines the message's clarity and credibility. Usage is rare, appearing mostly in scientific and news contexts. Remember to use "contain" after "does not" to ensure grammatical correctness. To avoid this error, consider alternative phrases such as "does not include" or "lacks".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

does not contain

This alternative uses the correct verb form "contain" instead of the incorrect "contained".

does not include

This alternative replaces "contain" with "include", offering a similar meaning with correct grammar.

lacks

This is a shorter, more direct way of saying something doesn't have something, maintaining grammatical correctness.

is without

This phrase provides a slightly more formal way of expressing absence, while ensuring proper grammar.

is devoid of

This alternative offers a stronger emphasis on the absence of something, maintaining grammatical accuracy.

does not consist of

This alternative focuses on the composition of something, indicating what it isn't made up of.

excludes

This alternative directly states that something is being left out or not included.

omits

This alternative implies that something has been intentionally left out.

is missing

This alternative simply states that something is not present.

fails to include

This alternative suggests a failure or inability to include something.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "contain" in a negative sentence?

The correct way to use "contain" in a negative sentence is with the auxiliary verb "does not". For example, "The box "does not contain" the missing parts".

Is it ever correct to use "contained" after "does not"?

No, it is grammatically incorrect to use "contained" directly after "does not". The correct form is "does not contain". "Contained" is the past participle and is used in different grammatical structures, such as passive voice.

What are some alternatives to saying "does not contain"?

Some alternatives to "does not contain" include "does not include", "lacks", or "is missing". The best alternative depends on the specific context.

How can I remember to use "contain" instead of "contained" after "does not"?

Think of "does" as already carrying the tense. Therefore, you need to use the base form of the verb, "contain". This is similar to other auxiliary verbs like "do", "can", or "will", which are also followed by the base form of the verb.