does not cause

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "does not cause" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something does not lead to a particular effect or result. Example: "The new policy does not cause any disruptions in the workflow."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Joblessness does not cause suicide.

The Economist

"Midazolam does not cause death.

The Guardian

It does not cause hopperburn.

Britannica

It does not cause autism.

The New York Times

Social networking does not cause cancer.

The Economist

However, shotblasting does not cause such decrease.

Construction and Building Materials

The latter diet does not cause hypernatremia.

Stanford University

Alcohol does not cause sexual assault".

The Guardian

Ethanol does not cause water pollution.

The New York Times

Typically, it does not cause serious complications.

The New York Times - Health

One does not cause the other.

The New York Times - Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "does not cause", ensure the relationship you're negating is one of direct causation, not just correlation. Be precise in specifying what effect is not produced.

Common error

Avoid stating "does not cause" when you only have evidence of a lack of correlation. Just because two things don't happen together doesn't mean one couldn't cause the other under different circumstances. Correlation isn't causation and lack of correlation isn't proof of lack of causation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "does not cause" functions as a causal negation. It explicitly denies a causal relationship between two elements. As Ludwig AI confirms, this denial is grammatically sound and widely applicable. For example, "Climate change does not cause hurricanes" refutes a direct causal link.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

35%

Academia

30%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "does not cause" serves as a crucial tool for negating causal relationships, as affirmed by Ludwig AI. With a high frequency of use across diverse fields like science, news, and academia, understanding its proper application is vital. Be mindful of differentiating between correlation and causation, and ensure clarity in your statements. Related phrases like "is not a cause of" and "does not result in" offer alternatives depending on the desired level of formality and emphasis. By avoiding common errors and adhering to best practices, you can wield "does not cause" with precision and accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is not a cause of

Rephrases the lack of causation more formally.

does not result in

Focuses on the lack of a specific outcome.

is not responsible for

Shifts the focus to accountability and origination.

is not the reason for

Highlights the lack of a logical basis.

plays no role in

Emphasizes the absence of influence.

is not linked to

Indicates a lack of correlation or association.

is unrelated to

Highlights the absence of any connection.

has no effect on

Focuses on the lack of impact or change.

doesn't trigger

More informal, emphasizing the lack of initiation.

isn't to blame for

Informal; places emphasis on negating fault or culpability.

FAQs

How can I use "does not cause" in a sentence?

Use "does not cause" to negate a causal relationship between two things, for example, "Joblessness "does not cause" suicide".

What are some alternatives to "does not cause"?

Alternatives include phrases like "is not a cause of", "does not result in", or "is not responsible for", depending on the context.

Is it better to say "does not cause" or "doesn't cause"?

Both "does not cause" and "doesn't cause" are grammatically correct. "Doesn't cause" is a contraction and is more informal, while "does not cause" is more formal and emphatic.

What's the difference between "does not cause" and "is not associated with"?

"Does not cause" implies a lack of direct causation, while "is not associated with" simply suggests that there isn't a correlation or relationship between two things. Causation implies a direct effect, while association only implies a pattern.