divided by types

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "divided by types" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when categorizing or classifying items or concepts into different groups based on their characteristics or features. Example: "The data was divided by types to better analyze the trends in consumer behavior."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Because co-authorship is a common phenomenon, the co-authored articles were further divided by types of collaboration.

Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

They want to be able to choose which services to offer, to design eligibility packages tailored to different types of patients, to require Medicaid patients to pay co-pays in emergency rooms so they will see a primary-care doctor instead, and to consolidate Medicaid financing streams now divided by type of care provider.

The New York Times

The patients were divided by type of breathing presented, using the protocol described in previous studies [11].

Progress in Orthodontics

Divided by type of situation, however, participants with higher levels of negative symptoms experienced and recalled more sadness related to being socially included and even recalled more positive emotions after being excluded.

Psychiatry Research

Primary sector visits were divided by type of care: general practitioner, medical specialist, therapists and other.

BMC Cancer

When divided by type of experiment, only one of eight Parental comparisons revealed enrichment for candidate genes.

BMC Biology

Data for all variables with differences between patients and health care professionals were divided by type of diabetes (type 1 and type 2, respectively) to see if differences were related to type of diabetes.

BMC Health Services Research

Population subgroups were divided by type of locality; for the Jewish population: urban localities, including the city of Beer-Sheva, urban satellite localities of Beer-Sheva, and agricultural localities; for the Bedouin population: permanent localities and traditional tribal settlements.

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

Interestingly, divided by type of IBE, HER2 positivity showed a borderline statistically significant increased risk of in situ IBEs (Log-Rank P = 0.09, HR 1.63 (95 % CI, 0.92 2.89), and no association with risk of invasive IBEs (Log-Rank p = 0.48, HR 0.78 (95 % CI, 0.40 1.55)), (Fig.  1b– c and Table  3).

BMC Cancer

When diabetes at enrollment was further divided by type of treatments according to the medication inventory, women with diabetes requiring insulin treatment had a significantly higher risk of lung cancer (HR 1.71 [95% CI 1.15 2.53]) compared with women without diabetes, as did those who self-reported use of insulin (1.45 [1.45–2.04]).

Diabetes Care

The samples are divided by different types of alteration and sampling location as in Fig. 2 (SCR, Bastione Santa Croce; GAR, Torrione dell'Arena; CSN, Bastione Castelnuovo; FST, Torrione Venier).

Heritage Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In technical writing, provide a brief explanation of each type to ensure clarity for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "divided by types" when the categories are not distinct or have significant overlap. This can lead to confusion and misinterpretation of the information.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "divided by types" functions as a prepositional phrase, often used to specify the criteria for categorization or separation. It indicates that a set of items or data has been partitioned based on their different types, as demonstrated by Ludwig's examples.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "divided by types" is a grammatically correct prepositional phrase frequently used to denote categorization based on distinct types. As shown by Ludwig, it commonly appears in scientific and technical contexts. While versatile, it's crucial to ensure that the categories used are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. Ludwig AI confirms its usability. Alternatives such as "categorized according to types" and "classified by kinds" offer similar meanings, but may vary slightly in formality. Proper usage enhances clarity and precision in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

categorized according to types

This alternative uses "categorized" which implies a more structured or formal classification.

classified by kinds

Replaces "types" with "kinds", offering a slightly less formal tone.

separated based on categories

Focuses on the act of separation, highlighting the distinct groups formed.

grouped by varieties

Uses "varieties" to suggest a range of different forms within each group.

sorted by classes

Implies a systematic arrangement into predefined classes or groups.

differentiated by forms

Highlights the distinguishing characteristics that set each type apart.

sectioned according to categories

This alternative implies creating sections or divisions based on established categories.

compartmentalized by genres

Suggests a more rigid separation, often used in the context of creative works.

arranged by sorts

A more general term for types, implies placing in order.

segregated by nature

Focuses on inherent qualities that distinguish the groups.

FAQs

How can I use "divided by types" in a sentence?

You can use "divided by types" to categorize data or subjects based on their characteristics. For example, "The data was "divided by types" of customer to analyze purchasing patterns".

What's a formal alternative to "divided by types"?

A more formal alternative to "divided by types" is "categorized according to types", which implies a structured classification system.

Is it correct to say "divided by type" instead of "divided by types"?

While "divided by type" might be grammatically correct in specific contexts referring to a singular type, ""divided by types"" is generally used when referring to multiple categories.

What is the difference between "divided by types" and "grouped by types"?

"Divided by types" emphasizes the separation into distinct categories, while "grouped by types" focuses on the act of bringing similar items together into categories.