Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
divergent from each other
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "divergent from each other" is correct and usable in written English.
It is a phrase that is used when two or more things are not similar, but instead quite different. For example, "The results of the experiment were divergent from each other, suggesting that the two groups reacted differently to the same stimulus."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(13)
different from each other
distinct from one another
at variance with each other
dissimilar from each other
disparate from each other
differing from each other
differentiated from each other
distinctive from each other
varying from each other
varied from each other
diverging from each other
diverse from each other
distinct from each other
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
53 human-written examples
The results of the functional divergence analysis suggested that caleosin genes should be significantly functionally divergent from each other, especially with respect to the three amino acid residues (70R, 88 L and 106A) identified by both PAML 4 and DIVERGE 2.0 analyses, which were inferred to have played important roles during evolution.
Science
The results of the functional divergence analysis suggested that WRKY genes should be significantly functionally divergent from each other, especially with respect to the four amino acid residues (248E, 275R, 288D and 298E) identified by both PAML 4 and DIVERGE 2.0 analyses, which were inferred to have played important roles during evolution.
Science
The results of type I functional divergence (Table 1) suggested that anoctamin genes should be significantly functionally divergent from each other, owing to the evolutionary rate and/or property differences at some amino acid sites.
Science
The results of the functional divergence analysis (Table 3) suggested that OPR genes should be significantly functionally divergent from each other, owing to the evolutionary rate differences at some amino acid sites.
Science
Clustering of morphotypes grouped Poshita and Nagore separately with high inter-cluster distances indicating that both groups are highly divergent from each other, suggesting that there is sufficient scope for varietal improvement through hybridization.
At a landscape scale, frequently flooded sites were similar while rarely flooded sites were more divergent from each other, suggesting that local and regional impacts on diversity vary across the flooding gradient.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
7 human-written examples
Moreover, although high correlations were observed between these two tests, each of them was made for different aims and, thus, may have divergent test constructs from each other.
Science
In particular, divergent (pointing away from each other) genes show greater correlation in their temporal dynamics (coexpression) and in noise than those in serial (pointing in the same direction) or convergent (pointing toward each other) genes (Trinklein et al. 2004; Wang et al. 2011), suggesting arrangement-dependent coexpression between adjacent genes.
Science
We conclude that the cyanobacterial clusters were less divergent to each other than clusters from Verrucomicrobiae.
Science
Due to the use of Monte-Carlo sampling in the gene design, all of these variants were highly divergent in sequence identity from each other.
Science
The PCA further suggests that while the W1-4, Fu, and Wd populations of both biotypes are genetically similar, both Df biotype populations are strongly divergent from the other sites and each other.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When comparing multiple elements, use "divergent from each other" to clearly emphasize their distinct and separate characteristics. This phrase is most effective when highlighting significant differences that influence your overall analysis.
Common error
While "divergent from each other" is a strong descriptor, it can sound overly formal in simple comparisons. Use simpler alternatives like "different" or "distinct" when the differences are minor or self-evident.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "divergent from each other" functions as an adjectival phrase, typically modifying a noun to describe a state of difference or variance among multiple entities. It highlights that the entities being compared are not similar but distinct. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is correct and widely usable in English.
Frequent in
Science
88%
Academia
6%
Wiki
2%
Less common in
Formal & Business
1%
News & Media
1%
Reference
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "divergent from each other" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression, particularly within scientific and academic writing. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread usability. It serves to emphasize notable distinctions between multiple entities, be they data sets, characteristics, or opinions. While broadly applicable, it's most commonly found in science-related contexts, such as in publications from BMC Evolutionary Biology, PlosOne, and Nature, suggesting a formal register. For simpler comparisons, alternatives like "different from each other" might be more appropriate, but "divergent from each other" is ideal for highlighting significant and impactful dissimilarities.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
dissimilar to one another
Focuses on the lack of similarity between the entities.
distinct from one another
Emphasizes the clear and recognizable differences between the entities.
different from each other
A more general term for describing variance, lacking specific emphasis.
varied amongst themselves
Highlights the internal variation within a group.
contrasting with one another
Implies a direct comparison that shows notable differences.
at variance with each other
Suggests a conflict or disagreement, either literally or figuratively.
unalike in nature
Describes the inherent dissimilarity of the entities' characteristics.
showing disparity
Emphasizes a significant difference in quality or kind.
demonstrating heterogeneity
Highlights the diverse composition of a group or set.
exhibiting dissemblance
Focuses on a deceptive difference or a lack of true similarity.
FAQs
How do I use "divergent from each other" in a sentence?
Use "divergent from each other" to describe two or more things that are significantly different. For example, "The findings of the two studies were "divergent from each other", indicating a need for further research."
What are some alternatives to "divergent from each other"?
Alternatives include "different from each other", "distinct from one another", or "dissimilar to one another". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it always necessary to include "each other" when using "divergent" to compare items?
While not always grammatically required, including "each other" clarifies that the divergence is mutual and directly between the items being compared, enhancing clarity.
What does it mean when data sets are described as "divergent from each other"?
It indicates that the data sets show significantly different results or patterns, suggesting that they may be influenced by different factors or represent different underlying phenomena.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested