distorting evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "distorting evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the manipulation or misrepresentation of facts or data to support a particular argument or viewpoint. Example: "The report was criticized for distorting evidence to fit the author's narrative."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

In making the request, the government added accusations of bribery and distorting evidence against the former official, Byeon Yang-ho.

The New York Times

The Mets are fighting the trustee, Irving H. Picard, in federal court and are accusing him of distorting evidence against them.

The New York Times - Sports

The two-month trial in United States District Court ended as it began, with Mr. Traficant veering into vulgarity and drawing reprimands from Judge Lesley Wells for misrepresenting the law and distorting evidence.

The New York Times

Ministers misled parliament over the need to build a new fleet of nuclear power stations, distorting evidence and presenting to MPs a false summary of the analysis they had commissioned, a group of MPs and experts alleged in a report published on Tuesday.

The Guardian

The alcohol industry has been accused of distorting evidence in an attempt to influence the Scottish government over its minimum pricing policy.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

When even a single person distorts evidence unbeknownst to their coauthors, the reputation of honest, unsuspecting scientists is at stake.

Nature

They say that Picard has distorted evidence and twisted their successful and unwitting investments with Madoff into something sinister.

The New York Times - Sports

I agree that much of contemporary political discourse has been marked by rampant confirmation bias -- the tendency to seek out evidence consistent with our beliefs, and deny, dismiss and distort evidence that is not.

The New York Times

The way Green twisted the meaning of this quote into its opposite is a vivid illustration of how the company distorts evidence to attack its adversaries.

Huffington Post

An SR with lower credibility can distort evidence.

Clinical Epidemiology

They sell these fake stories of cord blood cells curing all diseases, but the politicians have no way of knowing this is distorting the evidence".

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing legal or scientific matters, use "distorting evidence" to emphasize that factual information has been altered in a misleading way. This term is stronger than simply "misinterpreting" or "misunderstanding".

Common error

Avoid using the passive voice when describing who is "distorting evidence". Instead of saying "the evidence was distorted", specify who distorted it to make your writing more direct and impactful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "distorting evidence" functions as a verb phrase followed by a noun, describing an action performed on evidence. It's used to denote the act of altering or misrepresenting facts to support a particular claim or viewpoint. Ludwig AI confirms this phrase to be correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "distorting evidence" is a grammatically correct term that describes the act of misrepresenting facts or data, as validated by Ludwig AI. While not exceedingly common, it appears frequently in news and media and scientific writing. It carries a neutral register suitable for formal discussions or accusations of misrepresentation. When writing, be clear about who is doing the "distorting evidence" and avoid passive voice. Consider alternatives like "falsifying evidence" or manipulating evidence depending on the intended nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

falsifying evidence

This alternative focuses on creating false evidence, implying a more deliberate act of deception than simply altering existing evidence.

manipulating evidence

This suggests controlling or influencing evidence, often to achieve a desired outcome, highlighting the intentional aspect of alteration.

misrepresenting evidence

This focuses on presenting evidence inaccurately or incompletely, emphasizing the deceptive presentation rather than the alteration itself.

twisting evidence

This implies bending the evidence to fit a narrative, often suggesting a subtle yet significant alteration of its meaning.

altering evidence

This is a broader term that suggests any change to the evidence, not necessarily implying malicious intent.

tampering with evidence

This implies unauthorized or illicit alteration, often in a legal or investigative context, suggesting a violation of protocol.

suppressing evidence

This refers to withholding or concealing evidence, which, while not directly altering it, achieves a similar effect of misrepresentation.

obfuscating evidence

This means making the evidence unclear or confusing, hindering understanding and interpretation.

coloring evidence

This suggests presenting evidence with a particular bias or perspective, influencing its interpretation.

doctoring evidence

This is an informal term for altering evidence deceptively, often used in the context of documents or images.

FAQs

How can I use "distorting evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "distorting evidence" to describe actions where facts are misrepresented. For instance, "The prosecution accused the defense of "distorting evidence" to mislead the jury."

What's a more formal alternative to "distorting evidence"?

A more formal alternative is "falsifying evidence", which implies a more deliberate attempt to create false information.

What is the difference between "suppressing evidence" and "distorting evidence"?

"Suppressing evidence" involves withholding information, while "distorting evidence" involves altering or misrepresenting it. One hides, the other changes.

Is "manipulating evidence" the same as "distorting evidence"?

While similar, manipulating evidence suggests a level of control and influence over the evidence to achieve a specific outcome. "Distorting evidence" focuses more on the alteration and misrepresentation of the evidence itself.