disputing results

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "disputing results" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing disagreements or challenges regarding the outcomes of a study, experiment, or any evaluative process. Example: "The researchers are disputing the results of the clinical trial, claiming that the data was misinterpreted."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Nor is it simply a matter of disputing results.

The New York Times

Mr. Coleman is disputing results that so far show the Democrat, Al Franken, as the victor.

The New York Times

Even though ZANU-PF's own electoral agents endorsed the counts in polling stations, it is disputing results in 22 of the 210 parliamentary constituencies.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Then, at least 500 people were killed after disputed results triggered days of rioting in the north.

The Guardian

Disputed results in Kenya and Burkina Faso have led to outbreaks of post-election violence in recent years.

The Guardian

"The decision has not been made yet," Mr. Daley said of the question of whether Mr. Gore would seek to challenge disputed results in court.

The New York Times

Angola's civil war, which ended in 2002, included a resurgence of fighting over disputed results in the last elections, in 1992.

The New York Times

An article in yesterday's New York Times raises serious questions as to the appropriate US response to the political developments in Iran since the (disputed) results were announced.

The Guardian - Opinion

Mr. Tsvangirai defeated President Robert Mugabe in the presidential election on March 29, but, according to official, disputed results, did not win enough votes to avoid a runoff.

The New York Times

Meaningful recounts in close races are impossible without a paper trail, and if problems emerge with those voting machines, officials will be unable to audit disputed results.

The New York Times

With her expected big win in Puerto Rico on June 1, a collection of votes could give her the popular vote lead without including the disputed results from Michigan and Florida.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "disputing results", ensure that you provide a clear indication of the basis for the dispute. This could involve citing methodological flaws, alternative interpretations, or conflicting evidence to strengthen your argument.

Common error

Avoid using "disputing results" without providing sufficient justification. Simply stating disagreement without backing it up weakens your position and can undermine your credibility. Always substantiate claims with relevant data or logical reasoning.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "disputing results" functions as a gerund phrase, often acting as a noun. It describes the act of questioning or challenging outcomes, whether in elections as seen in the Ludwig examples, scientific studies, or any other evaluative process. Ludwig AI validates this as correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Science

34%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "disputing results" is a grammatically correct gerund phrase used to express disagreement or skepticism about certain findings or outcomes. Ludwig indicates that the phrase is suitable for use in written English. It is most frequently encountered in news and media contexts, with some presence in scientific discussions. Although not a very common phrase, using "disputing results" effectively requires providing clear justification for the dispute, citing evidence, and avoiding unsubstantiated claims. Related phrases include "questioning results" and "challenging results", offering varying nuances of disagreement.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

disputing the validity of results

Specifically questions whether the results are accurate or reliable.

questioning results

Suggests a simple inquiry or doubt about the validity of the results, less confrontational.

challenging results

Indicates a more proactive approach to contest the results, often implying an active attempt to disprove them.

contesting outcomes

Similar to challenging, but broader, as it can apply to any kind of outcome, not just scientific or statistical.

arguing against results

Implies a debate or disagreement about the interpretation or validity of the results.

rejecting results

Indicates a firm refusal to accept the results, often based on strong opposing evidence or beliefs.

dissenting from results

A formal way of expressing disagreement, often used in academic or legal contexts.

refuting results

Suggests an attempt to prove the results wrong using evidence or logical arguments.

disagreeing with results

A general term for not being in accord with the findings, without necessarily implying an active challenge.

casting doubt on results

Raises uncertainty about the reliability or correctness of the results, without directly contradicting them.

FAQs

What does "disputing results" mean?

The phrase "disputing results" means to challenge or question the validity, accuracy, or interpretation of the outcomes of a study, experiment, or election.

How can I use "disputing results" in a sentence?

You might say, "The candidate is "disputing results" of the election due to reported irregularities".

What are some alternatives to "disputing results"?

Alternatives include "questioning results", "challenging results", or "contesting outcomes", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it always appropriate to use the phrase "disputing results"?

The appropriateness of using "disputing results" depends on the context. It's suitable when there's a valid reason to doubt the accuracy or interpretation of the outcomes. Avoid using it without sufficient evidence or justification.