Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
discriminated for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "discriminated for" is not correct in standard English usage.
The correct expression is "discriminated against," which is used to indicate unfair treatment based on certain characteristics. Example: "She felt she was discriminated against because of her gender."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
25 human-written examples
The community has been sidelined and discriminated for generations.
News & Media
"And no matter what anybody says, they have that right to come here and choose to live here and they should not be discriminated for that".
News & Media
The early Christian Socialists - men like F.D. Maurice, Stewart Headlam and John Ludlow - understood that God discriminated for the poor, and shared something of the radical nature of Jesus's chosen social incarnation.
News & Media
This was confirmed using the collimator measurements where the rods with 0.4mm diameter could be discriminated for both temperatures.
Science
Note that PS3 and PS5 are merged with the underlying boundaries so that individual ages cannot be discriminated for these horizons.
Moreover, Moroccan candidates, as they come from a Muslim country, could be even more discriminated for religious reasons connected to Islamophobia.2.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
35 human-written examples
Theoretically, we show that banks may discriminate for non-profit reason, but that this discrimination diminishes with the incentives and human capital of bank managers.
For areas less than 0.7 the model did not discriminate; for areas 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9 the discrimination was acceptable, excellent, and outstanding, respectively.
Science
It is not actually illegal to discriminate for authenticity purposes in the theatre.
News & Media
SB1062 did not say that businesses can discriminate for religious reasons.
News & Media
It is a matter of civil rights that the military not discriminate for any reason.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use the phrase "discriminated against" instead of "discriminated for". The former is the grammatically correct and widely accepted form in standard English.
Common error
The preposition "for" does not correctly follow "discriminated". Using "discriminated for" introduces grammatical errors and obscures the intended meaning. Always use "discriminated against" to clearly convey unfair treatment.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "discriminated for" functions incorrectly as it violates standard English grammar rules. It attempts to link the act of discrimination with a reason, but the correct construction requires "against". Ludwig AI flags this usage as non-standard.
Frequent in
Science
43%
News & Media
36%
Wiki
14%
Less common in
Formal & Business
7%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "discriminated for" is grammatically incorrect in standard English. The correct and widely accepted form is "discriminated against". While Ludwig finds some examples of the phrase in use across various sources, including science, news media, and online encyclopedias, the prevailing grammatical standard dictates against its use. It's best to use alternatives like ""discriminated against"", "treated unfairly due to", or "subjected to discrimination because of" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, "discriminated for" is not considered standard usage.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
discriminated against
This is the standard and grammatically correct way to express being treated unfairly due to certain characteristics.
treated unfairly due to
Focuses on the unfair treatment received because of a specific reason or characteristic.
subjected to discrimination because of
Highlights the action of discrimination and its causal relationship to a specific factor.
marginalized due to
Emphasizes the social exclusion or relegation to the fringes of society because of a specific attribute.
penalized for
Suggests a punishment or disadvantage imposed because of a particular trait or action.
victimized by
Highlights the suffering and harm caused by discriminatory actions.
targeted because of
Implies that someone is intentionally singled out for negative treatment.
prejudiced against
Focuses on the preconceived biases that lead to discriminatory behavior.
disadvantaged by
Highlights the systemic barriers and lack of opportunities resulting from discrimination.
singled out for
Suggests being specifically chosen for differential treatment, often negative.
FAQs
What is the correct way to say someone was treated unfairly?
The correct phrase is "discriminated against". For example, "She was "discriminated against" because of her age".
Is "discriminated for" grammatically correct?
No, "discriminated for" is not grammatically correct in standard English. The correct phrasing is ""discriminated against"".
What can I say instead of "discriminated for"?
How does "discriminated against" differ from "discriminated for"?
"Discriminated against" is the grammatically correct phrase used to describe unfair treatment. "Discriminated for" is not standard English and should not be used.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested