Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

discriminated for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "discriminated for" is not correct in standard English usage.
The correct expression is "discriminated against," which is used to indicate unfair treatment based on certain characteristics. Example: "She felt she was discriminated against because of her gender."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

25 human-written examples

The community has been sidelined and discriminated for generations.

News & Media

The New York Times

"And no matter what anybody says, they have that right to come here and choose to live here and they should not be discriminated for that".

News & Media

The Guardian

The early Christian Socialists - men like F.D. Maurice, Stewart Headlam and John Ludlow - understood that God discriminated for the poor, and shared something of the radical nature of Jesus's chosen social incarnation.

News & Media

Independent

This was confirmed using the collimator measurements where the rods with 0.4mm diameter could be discriminated for both temperatures.

Note that PS3 and PS5 are merged with the underlying boundaries so that individual ages cannot be discriminated for these horizons.

Moreover, Moroccan candidates, as they come from a Muslim country, could be even more discriminated for religious reasons connected to Islamophobia.2.

Science

Genus
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

35 human-written examples

Theoretically, we show that banks may discriminate for non-profit reason, but that this discrimination diminishes with the incentives and human capital of bank managers.

For areas less than 0.7 the model did not discriminate; for areas 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9 the discrimination was acceptable, excellent, and outstanding, respectively.

It is not actually illegal to discriminate for authenticity purposes in the theatre.

News & Media

The Guardian

SB1062 did not say that businesses can discriminate for religious reasons.

News & Media

The Economist

It is a matter of civil rights that the military not discriminate for any reason.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the phrase "discriminated against" instead of "discriminated for". The former is the grammatically correct and widely accepted form in standard English.

Common error

The preposition "for" does not correctly follow "discriminated". Using "discriminated for" introduces grammatical errors and obscures the intended meaning. Always use "discriminated against" to clearly convey unfair treatment.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "discriminated for" functions incorrectly as it violates standard English grammar rules. It attempts to link the act of discrimination with a reason, but the correct construction requires "against". Ludwig AI flags this usage as non-standard.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

43%

News & Media

36%

Wiki

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "discriminated for" is grammatically incorrect in standard English. The correct and widely accepted form is "discriminated against". While Ludwig finds some examples of the phrase in use across various sources, including science, news media, and online encyclopedias, the prevailing grammatical standard dictates against its use. It's best to use alternatives like ""discriminated against"", "treated unfairly due to", or "subjected to discrimination because of" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, "discriminated for" is not considered standard usage.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say someone was treated unfairly?

The correct phrase is "discriminated against". For example, "She was "discriminated against" because of her age".

Is "discriminated for" grammatically correct?

No, "discriminated for" is not grammatically correct in standard English. The correct phrasing is ""discriminated against"".

What can I say instead of "discriminated for"?

How does "discriminated against" differ from "discriminated for"?

"Discriminated against" is the grammatically correct phrase used to describe unfair treatment. "Discriminated for" is not standard English and should not be used.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: