discrepancy with specifications

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "discrepancy with specifications" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing differences or inconsistencies between actual results and the defined specifications in a project or product. Example: "The quality control report highlighted a significant discrepancy with specifications that needs to be addressed before the product can be released."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

2 Results also indicated that outcomes promoted from primary to secondary between the protocol and the review were more likely to report statistically significant meta-analysis results in comparison to reviews where there was no discrepancy in outcome specification with the review protocol (relative risk 1.66 95% CI (1.10 to 2.49), p=0.02).

BMJ Open

"The team that compiled the list was provided with specifications which did not include personal information.

The Guardian

This would be like a "spec" engine, one with specifications shared by all the teams with very few changes allowed.

Huffington Post

We recognize this discrepancy with Equal Pay Day.

Huffington Post

Specifically, discrepancies with Hong Kong fell sharply after 1995, while discrepancies with China fluctuated over the period.

Globalization and Health

A secondary objective was to quantify the risk of bias in a set of meta-analyses where discrepancies between outcome specifications in protocols and reviews were found.

Plosone

Discrepancies between the specification of outcome measures in protocols and reviews have been described previously but, to our knowledge, this is the first study that has sought the reasons for such discrepancies.

Plosone

Discrepancies with the book's account immediately popped up.

The New York Times - Books

Important discrepancies with the experimental data are noticed.

Computers & Fluids

Have there been discrepancies with this person in the past?

Huffington Post

If all you get is an invitation to come to the dealership without any kind of bid attached, ignore it; they probably don't have what you want and are hoping to convince you to get something else.[5] If they send you a bid that doesn't match exactly with your specifications, circle any discrepancies so you can ask about them later.[6].

WikiHow

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "discrepancy with specifications", ensure you clearly identify both the actual outcome and the precise specification it deviates from for clarity.

Common error

Avoid vague statements about "discrepancy with specifications"; instead, provide concrete examples of what specifically deviates from which particular specification.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "discrepancy with specifications" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically modifying a noun or verb to indicate the nature of a difference or inconsistency relative to established specifications. This is confirmed by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "discrepancy with specifications" is a grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to denote a deviation from established requirements or standards. Ludwig AI confirms that it's usable in written English. While it can appear across various contexts, it's most frequently encountered in scientific, technical, or business domains. Alternatives such as "inconsistency in specifications" or "variance from specifications" offer similar meanings. When employing this phrase, clarity is key; always specify the exact nature of the deviation and the specific requirements it fails to meet.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

inconsistency in specifications

Replaces "discrepancy" with "inconsistency", focusing on the lack of uniformity within the specifications themselves.

variance from specifications

Substitutes "discrepancy" with "variance", highlighting the deviation from the expected specifications.

deviation from specified criteria

Emphasizes the act of departing from established criteria, rather than just a difference.

non-compliance with requirements

Focuses on the failure to adhere to mandatory requirements outlined in the specifications.

mismatch in stated parameters

Highlights a lack of agreement or correspondence within the defined parameters.

divergence from set standards

Implies a separation or branching away from established standards in the specifications.

conflict with defined attributes

Suggests a contradiction or opposition regarding the attributes outlined in the specifications.

departure from prescribed guidelines

Highlights a move away from the prescribed or recommended guidelines within the specifications.

incongruity with outlined criteria

Emphasizes a lack of harmony or agreement with the criteria outlined in the specifications.

disagreement with stipulated conditions

Indicates a lack of consensus or alignment with the stipulated conditions set forth in the specifications.

FAQs

How can I use "discrepancy with specifications" in a sentence?

You can use "discrepancy with specifications" to describe situations where there's a difference between expected and actual outcomes, such as: "The quality control report highlighted a significant "discrepancy with specifications" that needs to be addressed before the product can be released."

What's a good alternative to "discrepancy with specifications"?

Alternatives include "inconsistency in specifications", "variance from specifications", or "deviation from specified criteria" depending on the specific context.

What does "discrepancy with specifications" mean?

It refers to a situation where there's a notable difference or disagreement between the actual results or characteristics of something and the defined or expected specifications for that thing.

Is "discrepancy in specifications" grammatically correct?

While "discrepancy with specifications" is perfectly acceptable, "discrepancy in specifications" can also be used, although it slightly shifts the focus to the specifications themselves rather than the difference between expectation and reality.