disagree on the content

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "disagree on the content" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing differing opinions or perspectives regarding specific material or information. Example: "During the meeting, we found that we disagree on the content of the report, which led to a lengthy discussion."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

In "Parks and Recreation," at 8 30, Leslie Amyy Poehler and Ben Adam Scotttt) disagree on the content of her first campaign ad.

The New York Times

Scientists disagree on the content of the genus, with some recognizing Gorgosaurus libratus as a second species.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

To the extent that members of a scientific community disagree on the likelihoods, they disagree about the empirical content of their hypotheses, about what each hypothesis says about how the world is likely to be.

SEP

Scientists operating within the same field but with different background assumptions might disagree on the overall rules of scientific inquiry as well as its content.

Life Sciences, Society and Policy

However, studies disagree on the utility of quantifying the denitrifier community to predict denitrification rates.

Soil Biology and Biochemistry

But they disagree on the means.

The New York Times

"You can disagree on the issues, but the way that we disagreed was unacceptable".

The New York Times

Economists disagree on the indirect effects on employment over time.

University of California, Berkeley

The two women disagree on the war.

The New York Times

"We disagree on the speed of things.

The New York Times

(The landlord and tenant disagree on the precise amount).

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "disagree on the content", ensure that the specific subject or material being disagreed upon is clear to the reader. This helps avoid ambiguity and ensures the reader understands the focus of the disagreement.

Common error

Avoid using "disagree on the content" when the disagreement is about the interpretation or implications of the content, rather than the content itself. In such cases, phrases like "disagree on the interpretation" or "disagree about the implications" are more accurate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "disagree on the content" functions as a statement of opposition or divergence regarding specific material. It indicates a lack of consensus or shared perspective about the substance of something, as confirmed by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

35%

Wiki

35%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "disagree on the content" is a grammatically correct and commonly understood expression used to indicate differing opinions or perspectives regarding specific material or information. Ludwig's analysis reveals that while grammatically sound, the frequency is uncommon but usable in a variety of contexts, including science, news, and wiki articles. When employing this phrase, clarity is key, as is ensuring that the subject of disagreement is well-defined. Alternatives such as "have differing views on the subject matter" or "are at odds concerning the substance" can offer nuanced ways to convey similar meanings. It is important to be precise when indicating what exactly is causing the disagreement, rather than the interpretation itself.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have differing views on the subject matter

Replaces "disagree" with "have differing views" and "content" with "subject matter".

hold opposing opinions regarding the material

Substitutes "disagree" with "hold opposing opinions" and "content" with "material".

are at odds concerning the substance

Uses the idiom "are at odds" instead of "disagree" and "substance" in place of "content".

clash over the details

Replaces the entire phrase with a more concise expression.

differ in their perspectives on the topic

Focuses on differing perspectives rather than direct disagreement on content.

have conflicting interpretations of the information

Highlights the different interpretations as the source of disagreement.

are not in accord about the material

Emphasizes the lack of agreement using "not in accord".

find themselves in disagreement concerning the text

Formal rephrasing using "find themselves in disagreement".

dispute the elements

A more direct and simplified way to express disagreement.

diverge on the data

Uses "diverge" to indicate a separation in opinion regarding data.

FAQs

How can I use "disagree on the content" in a sentence?

You can use "disagree on the content" to indicate that different people or groups have different opinions about the material presented. For example, "The scientists "disagree on the content" of the report, leading to further research."

What's a more formal way to say "disagree on the content"?

A more formal alternative to "disagree on the content" is "hold opposing opinions regarding the material". This phrasing sounds more professional and is suitable for academic or business contexts.

What can I say instead of "disagree on the content" to emphasize a strong opposition?

If you want to emphasize a strong opposition, you could say "are at odds concerning the substance" or "clash over the details". These phrases suggest a more significant level of disagreement than simply ""disagree on the content"".

Is it always necessary to specify what people "disagree on the content" about?

While not always necessary, specifying what people ""disagree on the content"" about can provide clarity and context. If the subject of disagreement is obvious from the surrounding text, it may not be needed. Otherwise, it's best to be specific.