director for

USAGE SUMMARY

"director for" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
For example, "He applied for the position of director for the company's new venture."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

director for Cameroon, said in a statement.

The New York Times

He's a wonderful director for actors".

Independent

Christopher Smith is regional operations director for Circle Housing.

The Guardian

Ask the director for references.

The New York Times

National Clinical director for Dementia.

The Guardian

Sara Rad, director for brand development, was promoted to director for advertising and brand development.

The New York Times

Mr. Liebler becomes director for sales; he had been director for sales at XOS Digital, Boston.

The New York Times

Mr. Oakner becomes managing director for strategy and Mr. Thorpe becomes director for sales and marketing.

The New York Times

Ms. Driscoll becomes director for marketing and Mr. LaCroix becomes director for innovation.

The New York Times

And Alan Snitow, partner and director for strategy, becomes director for strategy and innovation.

The New York Times

Hayes, the director for four years.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider using more specific titles such as "managing director" or "creative director" for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "director of" when "director for" is more appropriate to indicate a specific area of responsibility or focus.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "director for" functions as a noun phrase modifier, specifying the area of responsibility or focus for a director. It indicates a particular department, project, or region that the director is in charge of, as seen in the Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Academia

31%

Science

16%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

13%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "director for" is a common and grammatically correct way to specify a director's area of responsibility, as confirmed by Ludwig. It is frequently used in news, academic, and scientific contexts to clearly define roles within organizations. While alternatives like "head of" or "manager of" exist, "director for" provides a specific and professional tone. Ensure to use a descriptive word about the area of responsibility like Director for Sales and Marketing. Avoid preposition errors, preferring "director for" when indicating a specific focus. Ludwig AI reinforces the phrase's validity and widespread use.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

head of

This alternative emphasizes the leadership aspect, focusing on the individual in charge rather than their specific function.

chief of

This alternative conveys a higher level of authority and responsibility.

manager of

This alternative highlights the administrative and oversight duties of a director.

leader of

This alternative focuses on the guidance and motivational aspects of the role.

principal of

This alternative suggests a primary role in the directing aspect.

supervisor of

This alternative emphasizes the oversight and monitoring responsibilities.

in charge of

This alternative is more informal and simply indicates responsibility.

responsible for

This alternative highlights the accountability aspect of the role.

overseer of

This alternative suggests a more detached, supervisory role.

coordinator for

This alternative emphasizes the organization and collaboration aspects of the role.

FAQs

How is "director for" used in a sentence?

The phrase "director for" typically precedes the area or department the director oversees. For example, "She is the director for marketing".

What are some alternatives to using "director for"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "head of", "manager of", or "in charge of".

What's the difference between "director of" and "director for"?

"Director of" typically indicates a general role or affiliation (e.g., "director of a company"), whereas "director for" specifies a particular area of responsibility or department (e.g., "director for marketing").

Is it appropriate to use "director for" in formal writing?

Yes, "director for" is appropriate in formal writing, especially when specifying a director's area of responsibility within an organization. However, ensure it aligns with the organization's official terminology. When writing for formal and business context avoid using slang.