director at

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "director at" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to the job title of someone who is in charge of an organization or business. For example: "Bob is the director at Microsoft."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Music Director at 92Y. www.johnbalamos.com.johnbalamos.com

The New York Times

"He was my director at that time.

The New Yorker

He has been a director at Maltby.

The New York Times

Gary Hersham, Director at Beauchamp Estates said.

Independent

He's now content director at Graphic.

The Guardian

He is the culinary director at Jezebel.

The New York Times

1994 Appointed director at Man City.

Independent

Policy director at Traidcraft from 2001.

Independent

Meenakshi Ganguly is South Asia director at Human Rights Watch.

The New York Times

Paula Reed, fashion director at Harvey Nichols, agreed.

The New York Times

Kerr is the athletic director at Morgan State University.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "director at" to specify a person's role and affiliation simultaneously, creating a concise and informative description.

Common error

Avoid replacing "at" with other prepositions like "of" or "in" when specifying the organization. "Director of" indicates a directorship within the organization, while "director at" specifies their affiliation with the organization.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "director at" functions as a noun phrase indicating a specific job title and affiliation. Ludwig examples show it specifying roles within various organizations, confirming its use in denoting a professional position.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Science

15%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "director at" is a common and grammatically correct way to specify someone's role and affiliation with an organization. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's widely used across various reputable sources, primarily in news, business, and science contexts. While alternatives like "head of" or "manager at" exist, "director at" is particularly effective for clearly indicating both the position and the associated institution. Remember to use "at" to specify affiliation and avoid confusion with "director of", which indicates a directorship within the organization.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

head of

Uses a more general term for leadership position.

manager at

Emphasizes the managerial responsibilities.

leader at

Highlights the leadership aspect of the role.

in charge of at

Focuses on the responsibility for a specific area or department.

responsible for at

Highlights the accountability for tasks at an organization

overseeing at

Emphasizes the supervisory aspect.

supervising at

Highlights the oversight role at a company

coordinating at

Focuses on the coordination duties inside the organization

leading at

Stresses the guidance aspect

chief of at

Highlights the top leadership position within the institution.

FAQs

How is "director at" used in a sentence?

Use "director at" to specify someone's position within an organization, as in "She is the marketing "director at" Google".

What are some alternatives to "director at"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "head of", "manager at", or "leader at" to convey a similar meaning.

Which is correct, "director at" or "director of"?

"Director at" and "director of" have slightly different meanings. "Director at" specifies affiliation with an organization, while "director of" refers to a directorship within the organization. The correct choice depends on the intended meaning.

What's the difference between "managing director at" and "director at"?

A "managing "director at"" typically has more responsibilities than a regular ""director at"", including oversight of operations and strategic planning. The exact difference can vary by company.