Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

directly follows

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "directly follows" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something comes immediately after something else in a sequence or order. Example: "The conclusion directly follows the analysis section in the report."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The following theorem directly follows from Theorem 2.1.

The following lemma needed in the further arguments, directly follows from Lemma 1 and Remark 1 of [7].

"Gigolos," which directly follows it, posits male escort services that are available only to women.

It's no coincidence that the Truffaut series at Film Forum directly follows a complete retrospective of Alfred Hitchcock's films.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It directly follows from Theorem 3.1.

A feedforward control trajectory directly follows from this parametrization.

Note that (3.3) directly follows from (6.7).

This directly follows from definitions of and.

This directly follows from the definition of.

It directly follows from Definition 2.4.

The result directly follows from Theorem 4.1.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "directly follows" to clearly indicate a sequential or causal relationship between two events or statements. This helps maintain clarity and logical flow in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "directly follows" when the connection is indirect or involves multiple steps. "Directly follows" implies an immediate and clear relationship; using it for weaker connections can mislead the reader.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.3/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "directly follows" functions as a transitive verb phrase indicating a sequential or causal relationship. As Ludwig AI confirms, it connects two events or statements, highlighting that one immediately comes after or results from the other. It is commonly used to maintain logical flow.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

1%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "directly follows" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to indicate a clear sequential or causal relationship. Ludwig AI underlines its function as a transitive verb phrase that is useful for maintaining a logical flow in writing. Predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts, its neutral tone makes it suitable for a variety of applications, although it is not appropriate for informal settings. While alternatives like "immediately succeeds" or "is a direct consequence of" exist, "directly follows" remains a versatile choice for emphasizing a direct connection between ideas or events.

FAQs

How to use "directly follows" in a sentence?

Use "directly follows" to indicate that something happens or results immediately after something else. For example, "The conclusion "directly follows" from the evidence presented".

What can I say instead of "directly follows"?

You can use alternatives like "immediately succeeds", "is a direct consequence of", or "naturally ensues from" depending on the context. Each alternative emphasizes a slightly different aspect of the relationship.

Which is correct, "directly follows" or "immediately follows"?

Both "directly follows" and "immediately follows" are correct and can often be used interchangeably. "Immediately follows" emphasizes the timing, while "directly follows" emphasizes the causal or logical link.

What's the difference between "directly follows" and "is related to"?

"Directly follows" implies a specific sequential or causal connection, whereas "is related to" indicates a broader, less defined association. Use "directly follows" when you want to highlight an immediate consequence or sequence.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.3/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: