direct interactions for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "direct interactions for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing specific types of interactions or engagements that are intended for a particular purpose or audience. Example: "The study focuses on direct interactions for improving communication between team members."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

We once again depict these as direct interactions for simplicity.

BMC Genomics

Examination of the HPRD indicated two direct interactions for AF4: SMand and ENL [ 23, 25].

Biochemical Journal

Cytokines are capable of a wide array of direct interactions – for example with central nervous system (Maes et al, 1995; Zalcman et al, 1994), liver, and muscle receptors (Beutler et al, 1985) – as well as mediating wasting (Fordy et al, 1999) in colorectal cancer.

British Journal of Cancer

On this basis, a mapping of ion channel components and their density or distributions in different types of neurons could provide an interesting perspective on direct interactions for neurons from different tissue types or brain areas, as well as e.g., between cholinergic interneurons and MSNs within striatum.

F1000Research

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

The dynamic response of the BHA has been attained by means of a Newmark-beta direct interaction for two different types of drill bit.

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology

However, the lack of evidence of direct interaction for numerous other R-protein/cognate effector pairs led to formulation of the guard hypothesis, which states that R-proteins can indirectly recognize pathogen effectors by sensing perturbations they induce.

BMC Genomics

In this study, we discovered 980 new potential direct targets of Gcm, demonstrated the direct interaction for 36 of them, and the use of Drosophila allowed us to discover eight new targets of the GCMs in humans, which include the characterization of a feedback loop for GCMs on themselves.

Genetics

Other mitochondrial proteins like inhibitors of apoptosis (IAPs) can inhibit the caspases via direct interaction; for example, XIAP (X-linked IAP) inhibits caspases 9, 3, and 7 [ 47] or IAP antagonists like SMAC/DIABLO (second mitochondrial activator of caspases/direct IAP binding protein with Low pI) or Omi/HtraA2 bind IAPs, preventing their function and favoring caspase activation.

BioMed Research International

The objective of the new approach is to find a global position for each residue providing an intersection-free arrangement of directed interactions for each individual complex diagram.

Journal of Cheminformatics

Although these assumptions are clearly unrealistic, they provide a useful starting point for separating direct interactions from indirect ones (see Discussion for possible relaxation of these assumptions).

Algorithms for Molecular Biology

The pathway was built by looking for direct interactions of the down-regulated and up-regulated proteins.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "direct interactions for" when you want to emphasize that the interactions are unmediated and straightforward, leading to a specific purpose.

Common error

Avoid using "direct interactions for" when you intend to include indirect or secondary effects. Instead, clarify whether the interaction is the sole influence or if other factors are also at play.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "direct interactions for" acts as a modifier to describe the type of interactions, highlighting that these interactions are straightforward and aimed towards achieving a particular goal. Ludwig confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

80%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "direct interactions for" is a grammatically sound construction used to specify that interactions are straightforward and geared toward a particular outcome. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is appropriate for use in written English. Predominantly found in scientific and news contexts, this phrase serves to highlight the unmediated nature of interactions aimed at a defined goal. While acceptable across various formal registers, being mindful of the intended meaning is crucial to avoid misuse. The provided examples in Ludwig underscore the phrase's utility in specifying intentional and immediate interaction.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

immediate interaction for

Emphasizes the promptness or lack of delay in the interaction.

personal interactions for

Highlights the individual and relational nature of the interactions.

hands-on interaction for

Implies a practical and involved approach to interacting.

face-to-face interactions for

Specifies that the interactions occur in person rather than remotely.

close interactions for

Suggests a tight and intimate style of interactions.

focused interactions for

Highlights how the interactions are precise and well-aimed.

purposeful interactions for

Emphasizes that the interactions have a clear intention or goal.

targeted interactions for

Highlights how the interactions are aimed at a specific group or goal.

one-on-one interactions for

Specifies that the interactions are between two individuals.

live interactions for

Emphasizes the real-time nature of the interactions.

FAQs

How can I use "direct interactions for" in a sentence?

You can use "direct interactions for" to describe a situation where the interactions are immediate and geared toward a specific outcome. For example, "The study focuses on "direct interactions for" improving communication between team members".

What is an alternative to saying "direct interactions for"?

Depending on the context, you could use "immediate interactions for", "personal interactions for", or "hands-on interaction for".

Is it correct to say "indirect interactions for"?

While grammatically correct, "indirect interactions for" implies a less straightforward connection. Consider whether "direct interactions for" is truly what you intend to convey, or if you mean something more nuanced.

What's the difference between "direct interactions for" and "direct interactions with"?

"Direct interactions for" emphasizes the purpose or goal of the interactions, while "direct interactions with" emphasizes the entity or individual involved. Choose the phrase that best reflects your intended focus.