Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

direct consequence from

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "direct consequence from" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression is "direct consequence of." Example: "The flooding was a direct consequence of the heavy rainfall."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

(4) is a direct consequence from (3).

First, a variety of dependability issues were a direct consequence from high clock frequencies and system-on-chip complexity, such as thermal, power, and stability challenges.

We have argued that the ill-defined pathogenesis of AL is a direct consequence from the largely unexplained, complicated biological process of anastomotic healing.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Now, we give here some direct consequences from Theorem 2.8 and Theorem 2.9.

Less than half of the users (n = 948, 41.78%) reported any direct contact with or any direct consequences from the tsunami disaster.

Our own studies in zebrafish provide clear evidence for migration of melanocytes and their precursors, melanoblasts, to the wound and, moreover, indicate that this is a direct consequence of signals from the earlier recruited innate immune cells.

The decrease in diclofenac use after 2008 may be a direct consequence of recommendations from the Danish Medicines Agency in 2008 29 and Danish Society for Cardiology in 2009 30 to use diclofenac with caution due to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease.

Stewart Maginnis, head of the IUCN Forest Conservation Programme, said: "Ocean acidification is a direct consequence of increased emissions from fossil fuels, and that's having a serious impact on marine life and coral reef systems".

News & Media

Independent

Part is a direct consequence of Part follows from the assumption that is of type (P).

The next lemma is a direct consequence of classical results from degree theory, for details see [15].

"However, it does appear that this renewed interest has come as a direct consequence of the offer from Super League Europe Ltd, which remains on the table.

News & Media

BBC
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "direct consequence of" instead of "direct consequence from". This ensures grammatical correctness and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "from" after "consequence"; the correct preposition is "of". Saying something is a consequence 'from' something else is grammatically incorrect and can confuse readers.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "direct consequence from" attempts to establish a cause-and-effect relationship. However, according to Ludwig AI, this is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "direct consequence of".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

67%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "direct consequence from" is considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. The correct form is "direct consequence of". Ludwig AI analysis shows that while examples of "direct consequence from" exist in various sources, including science and news media, using "direct consequence of" ensures grammatical accuracy and clarity. It's recommended to use alternatives like "direct result of" or "immediate effect of" to maintain proper grammar.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say something results from something else?

The correct phrasing is "direct consequence of", as in "The increase in prices was a "direct consequence of" inflation".

What can I use instead of "direct consequence from"?

Instead of "direct consequence from", use alternatives such as "direct result of", "direct outcome of", or "immediate effect of".

Is "direct consequence from" grammatically correct?

No, "direct consequence from" is not grammatically correct. The correct preposition to use is "of", making the phrase ""direct consequence of"".

What's the difference between "direct consequence from" and "direct consequence of"?

"Direct consequence from" is grammatically incorrect. The correct and widely accepted phrase is ""direct consequence of"", which indicates that something is a direct result or effect of something else.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: