direct conflicts

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "direct conflicts" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe situations where there are clear and opposing disagreements or clashes between parties, ideas, or interests. Example: "The negotiations broke down due to direct conflicts between the two sides' demands."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

16 human-written examples

There are no indications that there were direct conflicts of interest at work in these relationships, but some experts on corporate governance have said that such situations can distort the objectivity that directors should have in overseeing a company's management.

The New York Times

The election of a Tory-led government in the UK and a spate of Tea Party Republicans in the US initiated a sequence of austerity programmes – prompting direct conflicts between governments and organised workers.

The Guardian - Opinion

Direct conflicts of interest among football's various groups have also arisen: players, agents, television networks, competition sponsors, clubs, national bodies, continental associations, and FIFA all have divergent views regarding the staging of football tournaments and the distribution of football's income.

Encyclopedia Britannica

After the Cuban missile crisis of October 1962, which surprised and frightened the United States and the Soviet Union at how quickly they could unintentionally slide toward a nuclear exchange, the superpowers shifted to engaging each other indirectly through proxy wars in the third world rather than in direct conflicts.

The New York Times

Despite railing against my policy, he has his own direct conflicts of interest.

TechCrunch

Indeed, in view of the lack of direct conflicts, there is substantial reason to think indirect conflicts must be quite rare as standard empirical theorizing seems unlikely to yield conclusions about the domains about which intuition seems to inform us.

SEP

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

43 human-written examples

That places her in direct conflict with the Navy.

The New York Times

There is no direct conflict between the U.S. and Russia.

The New Yorker

There is not even direct conflict between Ukraine and Russia.

The New Yorker

Often, societal concerns over language and nudity are in direct conflict with artistic prerogatives.

The New York Times - Arts

That position puts the group in direct conflict with Mr. da Silva's government.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "direct conflicts", ensure that the context clearly establishes the parties, interests, or ideas involved in the conflict. This helps to avoid ambiguity and strengthens the impact of your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "direct conflicts" when the disagreements are minor or easily resolvable. Using stronger language for trivial issues dilutes the impact of the phrase when describing serious disagreements.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "direct conflicts" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the subject or object of a sentence. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase accurately describes clear and opposing disagreements. Examples show its usage across different contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

27%

Encyclopedias

14%

Less common in

Wiki

9%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "direct conflicts" is a grammatically sound and frequently used term, as confirmed by Ludwig AI, to depict situations involving overt disagreements or clashes. Its usage spans various contexts, notably news, science, and encyclopedias, maintaining a neutral to professional tone. When writing, ensure clarity by explicitly stating the involved parties and interests to avoid ambiguity. Common alternatives include "outright clashes" and "head-on collisions", each carrying subtle differences in emphasis. Be cautious about overusing this phrase for minor disagreements, preserving its impact for significant contentions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

outright clashes

Emphasizes the open and unconcealed nature of the conflict.

head-on collisions

Suggests a forceful and unavoidable confrontation.

frontal assaults

Implies an aggressive and direct approach to the conflict.

open hostilities

Highlights the overt and potentially aggressive nature of the conflict.

immediate disagreements

Focuses on the prompt and unresolved nature of the differing views.

explicit contradictions

Highlights the clear and unambiguous opposition between different elements.

straightforward oppositions

Underscores the simple and uncomplicated nature of the differing stances.

blatant discrepancies

Emphasizes the obvious and easily noticeable inconsistencies.

irreconcilable differences

Highlights the impossibility of resolving the disagreements.

diametrical oppositions

Focuses on the complete and extreme divergence between two sides.

FAQs

How can I use "direct conflicts" in a sentence?

You can use "direct conflicts" to describe situations where there are clear and opposing disagreements. For example, "The negotiations broke down due to "direct conflicts" between the two sides' demands".

What are some alternatives to "direct conflicts"?

Alternatives include "outright clashes", "head-on collisions", or "open hostilities", depending on the context.

Is it more appropriate to use "direct conflicts" or "indirect conflicts"?

The choice depends on whether the conflicts are overt and easily identifiable (use "direct conflicts") or subtle and less obvious (use "indirect conflicts").

What's the difference between "direct conflicts" and "conflicts of interest"?

"Direct conflicts" refers to open disagreements, while "conflicts of interest" describes situations where a person's personal interests could improperly influence their decisions.