did not send

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "did not send" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something was not dispatched or transmitted, often in the context of messages or packages. Example: "I realized that I did not send the email to the client before the deadline."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I did not send you".

The New Yorker

The army did not send out patrols.

The New York Times

Nusra did not send reinforcements.

The New Yorker

The student did not send the photos.

The Guardian

He did not send a distress signal.

The Guardian

He did not send a sell order.

The New York Times

The church did not send a representative.

The New York Times

Judge Sullivan did not send her home.

The New York Times

It did not send a distress signal.

The Guardian

And besides that, I did not send this telegram.

Yale University

Popes received ambassadors but did not send them.

Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "did not send" to clearly state that an action of sending or transmitting something was not performed, whether it's an email, a message, or a physical object. Its straightforward nature makes it suitable for most contexts.

Common error

Overusing the passive voice can make your writing less direct. Instead of "The email was not sent by him", use the active voice: "He "did not send" the email".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "did not send" functions as a verbal phrase, expressing the negation of the action of sending. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's a grammatically correct and widely used expression.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

20%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

8%

Science

7%

Formal & Business

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "did not send" is a grammatically sound and versatile expression used to negate the action of sending. As affirmed by Ludwig AI, its straightforward nature makes it appropriate for various contexts, ranging from formal news reports to academic papers and casual conversations. While alternatives like "failed to dispatch" or "omitted to transmit" exist for more formal situations, ""did not send"" offers a clear and concise way to communicate the absence of sending something. Its high frequency across diverse sources underscores its reliability and widespread acceptance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

failed to dispatch

Emphasizes a failure in the action of sending, implying a possible expectation or requirement to send something.

neglected to forward

Suggests an oversight or carelessness in not sending something, implying a duty or intention to do so.

omitted to transmit

A more formal way of saying something was not sent, often used in technical or official contexts.

held back from sending

Indicates a deliberate decision not to send something, implying a reason or motive for withholding it.

abstained from dispatching

Similar to 'held back', but suggests a more formal or principled decision not to send something.

refrained from forwarding

Implies a conscious effort to avoid sending something, suggesting a potential reason or temptation to send it.

didn't convey

Focuses on the lack of communication or delivery of information, rather than the physical act of sending.

did not relay

Similar to 'didn't convey', emphasizing the failure to pass on information or a message.

did not remit

Specifically refers to the failure to send money or a payment.

never mailed

Specifies the act of sending via postal service, which was not performed.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "did not send" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases such as "failed to dispatch", "omitted to transmit", or "refrained from forwarding". The choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you wish to convey.

What's the difference between "did not send" and "failed to send"?

"Did not send" is a straightforward statement that something wasn't dispatched. "Failed to send" implies an attempt was made, but it was unsuccessful, which carries a slightly different meaning.

Is it ever appropriate to use "didn't send" instead of "did not send"?

"Didn't send" is a contracted form of ""did not send"" and is suitable for informal contexts. In formal writing, it's generally better to use the full form, ""did not send"".

Can "did not send" be used for both physical items and digital communications?

Yes, ""did not send"" is versatile and can be used whether you're referring to a letter that wasn't mailed, an email that wasn't dispatched, or a package that wasn't shipped.