did not replace

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "did not replace" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something was not substituted or exchanged for something else in a specific context. Example: "The new policy did not replace the existing guidelines, but rather complemented them."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

The court did not replace the commission.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Ferguson did not replace any of them.

The Guardian - Sport

But the Fed did not replace it.

The New York Times

The fund did not replace direct giving to the university.

The New York Times

News did not replace ads on page one until 1952.

The Guardian

Honda did not replace the slow-selling Accord Hybrid.

The New York Times

Their efforts were technically promising, but they did not replace the sport gas balloon.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The Volcano actors did not replace the play's text with movement, Hoggett says.

The New Yorker

The dollar did not replace sterling until half a century after America's economy had overtaken Britain's.

The Economist

And with a left-leaning offense that did not replace Jayson Werth, the Phillies have questions.

The New York Times - Sports

Because Luiten did not replace the ball, that would have added another stroke.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "did not replace", ensure clarity about what was expected to be replaced and why it wasn't. Providing context enhances understanding.

Common error

Avoid using "did not replace" when the intention was not to substitute entirely but to augment or complement. Instead, clarify that the new element supplemented rather than replaced the existing one.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "did not replace" functions as a negative transitive verb phrase. It indicates that a subject failed to substitute or take the place of an object. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct. The phrase asserts the absence of a replacement action.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Wiki

7%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "did not replace" is a common and grammatically correct way to express that something was not substituted or exchanged for something else. According to Ludwig, it is widely used in various contexts including news, science, encyclopedias and wikis. When using this phrase, it is important to clarify what was expected to be replaced and why it wasn't, providing context for better understanding. Alternative phrases such as "did not substitute" or "did not supplant" can also be used depending on the nuance desired. However, care should be taken to avoid using "did not replace" when the intention was augmentation rather than complete substitution.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

did not substitute

Replaces "replace" with "substitute", maintaining a similar meaning of not exchanging one thing for another.

did not take the place of

Expresses the idea of not substituting something directly, focusing on the act of occupying a position.

did not supplant

Uses "supplant", which implies not displacing or taking the place of something else, often in a more formal context.

did not act as a substitute for

Similar to "did not substitute", but includes "act as a", emphasizing the role or function.

did not supersede

Employs "supersede", indicating that something did not take precedence over or replace something else in authority or use.

was not a replacement for

Rephrases the sentence to use a noun form, "replacement", clarifying that something was not intended as a substitute.

did not serve as a replacement for

Highlights the function of replacing, similar to 'was not a replacement for'.

did not displace

Implies that one thing did not remove or take over the position of something else.

was not exchanged for

Focuses on the action of exchange, indicating that no substitution occurred.

did not become a stand-in for

Uses "stand-in" to suggest a temporary replacement, clarifying that no temporary substitution occurred.

FAQs

How can I use "did not replace" in a sentence?

Use "did not replace" to indicate that something was not substituted or exchanged for something else. For example, "The new software "did not replace" the old system, but complemented it."

What can I say instead of "did not replace"?

You can use alternatives like "did not substitute", "did not supplant", or "did not take the place of" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "did not replace" or "didn't replace"?

Both ""did not replace"" and "didn't replace" are grammatically correct. "Didn't replace" is a contraction and is more informal.

What's the difference between "did not replace" and "did not improve"?

"Did not replace" indicates that one thing was not substituted for another, while "did not improve" means that something did not get better. They have different meanings and cannot be used interchangeably.