did not negatively affect

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "did not negatively affect" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something had no adverse impact on a situation or outcome. Example: "The changes implemented in the project did not negatively affect the overall performance of the team."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

While a history of criminal charges did not negatively affect treatment retention, those with prior charges had significantly fewer opioid-negative months and were less likely to have ≥6 opioid-negative months.

Health & Justice

He added that the government had considered the corporation's arguments about ensuring the audit process did not negatively affect BBC Worldwide's commercial performance and would consider them in negotiations ahead of the publication of its new royal charter.

The Guardian

Labelling did not negatively affect monocyte survival and function.

EJNMMI Research

Bran extrusion therefore modified dough rheology but did not negatively affect bread quality.

LWT - Food Science and Technology

Contrary to expectations, peer plagiarism and pedagogical lurking did not negatively affect students' performances.

Computers & Education

Overall, compared with the CSBAA diet, feeding FPAA did not negatively affect milk yield and milk protein synthesis.

Journal of Dairy Science

In vitro, MTT and flow cytometry analyses showed that the APC did not negatively affect cell viability and apoptosis.

Biomaterials

The RW treatments did not negatively affect plant growth, while RW2 even led to an increase in biomass.

Plant Physiology and Biochemistry

Low-dose DTX did not negatively affect iDC viability and instead promoted maturation and IL-12 production.

Translational Oncology

Lactic acid bacteria in whey permeate did not negatively affect the co-fermentation or reduce ethanol yield.

Journal of Dairy Science

The results of chemical and mineralogical analyses showed that using Ladle Furnace slag to produce Portland cement did not negatively affect the mineralogical characteristics.

Construction and Building Materials

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "did not negatively affect" to clearly state that an action or condition had no harmful consequences, particularly in formal reports or scientific writing. For example, “The new policy did not negatively affect employee morale.”

Common error

While "did not negatively affect" is acceptable, excessive use of passive voice can make your writing sound weak. Consider using active voice alternatives when possible to make your statements more direct and impactful. For instance, instead of 'The budget cuts did not negatively affect the project,' try 'The project remained unaffected by the budget cuts'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "did not negatively affect" functions as a verb phrase expressing the absence of a negative impact on something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a grammatically sound way to indicate that a particular action or condition had no harmful consequences. The examples show its usage across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

83%

News & Media

12%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "did not negatively affect" is a grammatically correct and very common phrase used to indicate the absence of adverse consequences. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is usable in written English to specify that something had no adverse impact on a situation or outcome. Analysis of usage data reveals its frequent occurrence in scientific and technical writing, with neutral to formal register. Alternative phrases such as "had no adverse impact on" or "did not harm" can be used for similar meanings. Overall, the phrase is considered appropriate for formal communications when conveying that an action or condition had no harmful consequences.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

had no adverse impact on

Emphasizes the absence of any harmful or unfavorable effect.

did not harm

A simpler and more direct way of saying that something caused no damage.

did not impair

Suggests that something's function or value remained intact.

left untouched

Indicates that something remained in its original state, without negative alterations.

did not compromise

Highlights that standards or quality were maintained without decline.

did not undermine

Implies that something's stability or strength was not weakened.

did not impede

Focuses on the absence of obstruction or hindrance.

did not disrupt

Indicates that something proceeded smoothly without interruption.

did not diminish

Highlights the lack of reduction or lessening in value or quality.

did not degrade

Implies the absence of decline in quality or condition.

FAQs

What is a good way to rephrase "did not negatively affect"?

Alternatives to "did not negatively affect" include "had no adverse impact on", "did not harm", or "did not impair", which offer varied emphasis depending on context.

How can I use "did not negatively affect" in a sentence?

You can use "did not negatively affect" to indicate that a particular action or event had no detrimental impact. For example: "The change in management did not negatively affect the company's performance."

Is it better to use "did not negatively affect" or "had no effect on"?

"Did not negatively affect" implies that a positive or neutral effect was expected, while "had no effect on" is neutral. The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey. For instance, if you're mitigating concerns, "did not negatively affect" is more reassuring.

What's the difference between "did not negatively affect" and "positively affected"?

"Did not negatively affect" indicates the absence of harm, whereas "positively affected" indicates a beneficial impact. They represent opposite ends of the spectrum regarding the outcome of an action. It's important to note that if something "did not negatively affect" something else, it also means that it did not improve it, it remained neutral.