did not impair

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "did not impair" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something did not cause damage or a negative effect on a situation or condition. Example: "The new policy did not impair the overall productivity of the team."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It also pointed out that the settlement did not impair any of Jefferson County's bonds.

The New York Times

These early losses gave him an acute apprehension of mortality, but did not impair the flow of his affections.

The Guardian - Books

The fact that Mellon's Pittsburgh speech was now strongly doused in Cockney did not impair the illusion for Duveen.

The New Yorker

Furthermore, slight overfilling did not impair success.

Evidence-Based Endodontics

Anxiety did not impair performance on simple reading tasks.

Behaviour Research and Therapy

Using a foreign language for teaching did not impair performance.

Learning and Instruction

AR system false alarms and misses did not impair driver responses to potential hazards.

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

The nanofilms did not impair the growth and differentiation of osteoblasts and chondrocytes.

Acta Biomaterialia

Results indicated that testosterone administration on its own did not impair RMET performance.

Psychoneuroendocrinology

The results demonstrated that the fluorochromes used in this study did not impair sperm motility or viability.

Theriogenology

In two cases, where the cast was too soft, artifact movements were observed but did not impair the MRI procedure.

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "did not impair", ensure that the subject and object of the phrase are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For instance, instead of saying "The changes did not impair", specify what the changes did not impair, such as "The changes did not impair the system's performance".

Common error

Avoid using "did not impair" when a negative effect is actually present, even if it's minor. "Did not impair" indicates no significant hindrance, so use more nuanced language like "slightly affected" or "minimally impacted" if there was some effect.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "did not impair" primarily functions as a verb phrase indicating the absence of a negative effect or hindrance. Ludwig examples illustrate its use in contexts where an action or condition does not diminish or damage something else. This aligns with Ludwig AI's confirmation that the phrase is correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

76%

News & Media

22%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "did not impair" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression that indicates the absence of a negative impact or hindrance. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is appropriate for use in written English. Its primary function is to assure that something has not been damaged or weakened. While generally neutral to formal in register, it is most commonly found in scientific and news media contexts. Alternatives like "did not hinder" or "did not affect" can be used depending on the specific nuance required. When using this phrase, ensure clarity in specifying what was not impaired and avoid using it when even minor negative effects are present. As Ludwig examples illustrate, this construction is valuable for objectively stating that something did not have a diminishing or detrimental effect.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

did not hinder

Replaces "impair" with "hinder", focusing on the prevention of progress or action.

did not impede

Similar to "hinder", suggesting that something was not obstructed or delayed.

did not affect

A broader term than "impair", indicating no influence or change.

did not undermine

Indicates that something was not weakened or damaged.

did not damage

Highlights the absence of physical harm or negative alteration.

did not compromise

Suggests that something was not put at risk or weakened.

had no effect on

A more general way of saying that something did not influence something else.

did not diminish

Implies that something was not reduced in size, extent, or importance.

did not degrade

Focuses on the preservation of quality or condition.

left intact

Emphasizes that something remained untouched and unaltered.

FAQs

How can I use "did not impair" in a sentence?

Use "did not impair" to indicate that something did not weaken, damage, or hinder something else. For example, "The new regulations "did not impair" the company's ability to innovate."

What are some alternatives to "did not impair"?

You can use alternatives like "did not hinder", "did not affect", or "did not compromise" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "did not impair" or "had no effect on"?

"Did not impair" is more specific, suggesting that something's functionality or quality was not diminished. "Had no effect on" is broader, simply indicating no influence whatsoever. Choose based on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What is the difference between "did not impair" and "did not improve"?

"Did not impair" means something didn't get worse, while "did not improve" means it didn't get better. Something can "did not impair" the situation while also failing to improve it.