did not mutually hold

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "did not mutually hold" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to express that two or more parties did not share or possess something in common. Example: "The two organizations did not mutually hold the same values, which led to conflicts in their collaboration."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

These groups seemed mutually exclusive because women did not report holding onto both beliefs at once.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

He did not hold back.

The New York Times

They did not hold back.

The Economist

He didn't hold grudges".

The New York Times - Sports

He didn't hold back.

BBC

I didn't hold him.

BMJ Open

Our analysis indicates that though there certainly are, and needs to be, unique subjectivist features in interpretive studies as compared to more 'objectivist' approaches, there are also important similarities, and that the view of sociological paradigms as necessarily mutually exclusive does not hold water.

Accounting, Organizations and Society

Second, the Kim et al. [ 22] result requires that the components of the numerator and denominator be mutually independent, which does not hold.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

They do not hold that all phenomena will support ineliminable pluralism, but that there are some phenomena that will require mutually irreducible or incompatible models.

SEP

This impression does not seem to hold when all variables are mutually adjusted for.

American Journal of Human Biology

Whereas copy number changes within signalling pathways have been shown to occur in a mutually exclusive fashion [ 10], the same does not appear to hold for DNA methylation.

Clinical Epigenetics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "did not mutually hold", ensure that the context clearly indicates what is not being shared or commonly possessed. For example, specify the values, beliefs, or responsibilities that the entities in question do not mutually hold.

Common error

Avoid using "did not mutually hold" in overly complex sentences where simpler alternatives like "did not share" would improve clarity. Clarity is key.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "did not mutually hold" functions as a predicate in a sentence, specifically denoting the absence of a shared attribute, belief, or characteristic between two or more subjects. Ludwig examples shows that the phrase implies a distinction or divergence in shared properties.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "did not mutually hold" is a grammatically correct way to express that two or more entities do not share a common attribute, belief, or responsibility. While accurate, it's important to consider whether simpler alternatives like "did not share" might improve clarity. As Ludwig AI points out, it is mostly present in Scientific sources and News & Media, and it's advisable to ensure context clearly states what is not being shared.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

did not share

Replaces "mutually hold" with the simpler verb "share", indicating a lack of common possession or agreement.

did not have in common

Focuses on the absence of shared attributes or characteristics.

did not reciprocally hold

Highlights a lack of two-way possession or adherence.

did not jointly possess

Emphasizes the lack of joint ownership or control.

did not commonly uphold

Emphasizes a failure to jointly support or defend something.

did not collectively maintain

Highlights the absence of shared upkeep or support.

did not jointly adhere to

Focuses on a lack of shared commitment or belief.

did not concurrently have

Focuses on the lack of simultaneous possession.

did not concurrently support

Highlights a lack of simultaneous agreement or backing.

did not mutually recognize

Indicates a lack of shared acknowledgement or understanding.

FAQs

What does "did not mutually hold" mean?

The phrase "did not mutually hold" means that two or more entities did not share or possess something in common, such as beliefs, values, or responsibilities.

What can I say instead of "did not mutually hold"?

You can use alternatives like "did not share", "did not have in common", or "did not jointly possess", depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "did not mutually hold"?

Yes, "did not mutually hold" is grammatically correct, though it may sound somewhat formal or less common than alternatives like "did not share". Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and provides real-world examples of its usage.

How can I use "did not mutually hold" in a sentence?

Use "did not mutually hold" when you want to express that two or more parties did not share or possess something together. For example: "The two organizations "did not mutually hold" the same values, which led to conflicts in their collaboration."