did not exclude from

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "did not exclude from" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something or someone was included in a group or category rather than being left out. Example: "The committee did not exclude from consideration any proposals that met the basic criteria."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

This came with complex rules to ensure that Northern Ireland's Protestant majority (which is "unionist", wanting the province to stay British) did not exclude from power the Catholic minority (which is "nationalist", seeking a united Ireland).

The Economist

From a pragmatic practical perspective epidemiologists might be able to collect and crunch statistics more effectively if they did not exclude from their design and their analysis the larger political economic contexts, cultural meanings, and explanatory dynamics for the socially taboo behaviours surrounding addiction and infection that their protocols attempt to document.

International Journal of Drug Policy

We did not exclude from the analysis patients with renal impairment or gastrointestinal pathologies.

Critical Care

We did not exclude from this study patients receiving antibiotics before aspirations or patients having the diagnosis of a systemic inflammatory disease.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

We did not exclude from the systematic review the studies presenting data not stratified by age, although these were not eligible for all data synthesis.

BMC Public Health

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

On the other hand, BNKL, although focused on choosing the most significant regulations, does not exclude from using even those genes which are found to be in no interaction with the rest.

BMC Medical Genomics

The absence of macroscopic disease after surgery, a good KPS are, of course, favourable prognostic factors; although they do not exclude from recurrence and patients remain with a short life expectancy in both groups.

British Journal of Cancer

Therefore, we did not exclude sera from older people or from countries with serum collection during less than a whole year.

BMC Public Health

Although we did not exclude people from local ethnic minority communities from participating in NLNY, only a few were enrolled.

BMJ Open

However, since omitting these sites from subsequent analyses did not change the results, we did not exclude them from the study.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

First, Mr Wilkinson and Ms Pickett did not exclude outliers from their sample.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "did not exclude from", ensure the context clearly indicates what was included as a result. For instance, specify the criteria used for inclusion, or the scope of the analysis.

Common error

Avoid phrases like "did not exclude from inclusion", as it's redundant. Simply use "included" or "did not exclude".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "did not exclude from" functions as a verb phrase indicating inclusion or non-omission. As Ludwig AI suggests, it signifies that something was deliberately not excluded. Examples from Ludwig show its use in academic research and news reporting.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

80%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "did not exclude from" is a grammatically correct, though somewhat infrequent, way to indicate that something was included rather than omitted. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's most commonly found in scientific and formal contexts, highlighting the inclusion of specific elements in an analysis or consideration. When writing, make sure to clearly state what was included and to avoid redundant phrasing. Alternative phrases like "included" or "did not omit" may offer more concise options.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

included

Direct synonym focusing on the act of inclusion.

did not omit

Replaces "exclude" with "omit", keeping the negative construction.

did not leave out

Uses a more informal phrasal verb instead of "exclude".

did not preclude

Uses a more formal synonym for "exclude", maintaining a similar structure.

considered

Implies inclusion in a set of possibilities or options.

took into account

Focuses on the act of considering something, implying it wasn't excluded.

embraced

Suggests a more positive and active form of inclusion.

incorporated

Highlights the merging or integration of something into a whole.

accommodated

Emphasizes adapting or making room for something.

allowed for

Indicates that something was permitted or made possible.

FAQs

How can I use "did not exclude from" in a sentence?

Use "did not exclude from" to indicate that something or someone was considered or included, rather than being omitted. For example, "The study did not exclude patients with mild symptoms from the analysis."

What's an alternative to "did not exclude from"?

You can use alternatives like "included", "did not omit", or "considered" depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "included" or "did not exclude from"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "included" is more direct and concise. "Did not exclude from" can be useful when you want to emphasize the lack of exclusion as a deliberate choice.

Which is correct, "did not exclude from" or "excluded from"?

"Excluded from" indicates that something was deliberately left out. "Did not exclude from" means it was deliberately included or at least not left out. Choose the phrase that accurately reflects your intention.