did not elicit

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "did not elicit" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a response or reaction that was not provoked or drawn out from someone or something. Example: "The question posed to the audience did not elicit any significant feedback."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That did not elicit any response.

The New York Times

The D-periosteum did not elicit a severe immunogenic response.

Acta Biomaterialia

This e-mail did not elicit a response.

The New York Times

PgAFP did not elicit any additional increase in permeability of CaCl2-incubated A. flavus.

Food Microbiology

Aβ-HBc VLPs immunization did not elicit Aβ-specific T cell proliferation.

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Autoclave-killed conidia did not elicit a SiTf induction response from worker ants.

Gene

Both bulk and thin films of gels did not elicit TNF-α secretion from the macrophages.

Biomaterials

In contrast, porcine elastin did not elicit any response at all.

Biomaterials

Unpleasant stimulation did not elicit higher beta or gamma responses in the random design.

Brain Research

The news did not elicit shouts of joy at Nagl's base.

The New York Times - Magazine

The tender offer did not elicit much of a reaction from investors yesterday.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "did not elicit", ensure the context clearly indicates what was expected to produce a response and why it failed to do so. For instance, specify the stimulus and the anticipated reaction to enhance clarity.

Common error

Avoid assuming that "did not elicit" automatically implies complete failure. A stimulus might not have produced the desired response, but it could still have had some effect. Clarify whether you mean the absence of a specific reaction or the absence of any reaction at all.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "did not elicit" functions as a verbal phrase indicating the absence of a specific response or reaction. As confirmed by Ludwig, it demonstrates that a stimulus or action failed to produce an intended or expected outcome. Examples on Ludwig showcase its utility across scientific, news and general contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

65%

News & Media

27%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "did not elicit" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed expression used to describe the absence of a particular response. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it commonly appears in scientific, news, and formal contexts. The analysis indicates that while alternatives such as "failed to evoke" or "did not generate" exist, "did not elicit" provides a clear and direct way to convey a lack of effect. Therefore, understanding its proper usage and nuances helps ensure clarity and precision in writing and communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

failed to evoke

Replaces "elicit" with "evoke", implying a failure to bring about a feeling or response.

did not generate

Substitutes "elicit" with "generate", focusing on the absence of creation or production of a response.

did not produce

Similar to "did not generate", but emphasizes the lack of output or result.

did not prompt

Replaces "elicit" with "prompt", highlighting the failure to initiate or trigger a response.

did not trigger

Emphasizes the absence of a triggering action, indicating that nothing was set off as a result.

did not stimulate

Focuses on the lack of activation or encouragement of a reaction.

did not provoke

Highlights the failure to incite or instigate a reaction or feeling.

failed to draw out

Emphasizes the lack of success in extracting or obtaining a response.

did not bring about

Focuses on the lack of causing or producing a particular outcome or result.

left unanswered

Indicates that something was not responded to, remaining unresolved.

FAQs

How can I use "did not elicit" in a sentence?

Use "did not elicit" to indicate the absence of a particular response or reaction. For example: "The presentation "did not elicit" any questions from the audience."

What are some alternatives to "did not elicit"?

Alternatives include "failed to evoke", "did not generate", or "did not provoke". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "did elicit no response" instead of "did not elicit a response"?

While "did elicit no response" is grammatically valid, "did not elicit a response" is more common and generally preferred in contemporary English. Using "did not elicit" is typically clearer and more direct.

What's the difference between "did not elicit" and "failed to elicit"?

"Did not elicit" simply states that something didn't produce a response, whereas "failed to elicit" emphasizes a lack of success or an attempt that didn't achieve the desired outcome. "Failed to elicit" often implies a greater sense of expectation or intention.