did not differ significantly from

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "did not differ significantly from" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are making a comparison between two or more things, and when you want to say that there is not a very noticeable or important difference between them. For example: "The test scores of the two groups did not differ significantly from one another."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

50 human-written examples

Heterozygotes did not differ significantly from controls.

Nature

In support of this hypothesis, Orientation and Linearity did not differ significantly from each other.

Nature

In the medicated patients, SAPAP1 did not differ significantly from the value for the controls.

Nature

Supporters and non-supporters did not differ significantly from each other.

Landscape and Urban Planning

Water chemistry parameters of created-unamended did not differ significantly from those of natural wetlands.

Journal of Environmental Management

CS-B did not differ significantly from the other three treatments.

Animal Reproduction Science

These novel regular smokers did not differ significantly from the non-smokers at baseline.

European Neuropsychopharmacology

Free fatty acid bioavailability (91%) did not differ significantly from natural triglycerides.

Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids

Growth of nerve growth factor-treated cerebellar grafts did not differ significantly from growth of cytochrome c-treated grafts.

Stanford University

However, APAP did not differ significantly from placebo (p = 0.71).

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Child-only victimization effects, however, did not differ significantly from adult-only victimization.

Duke University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Provide the p-value or confidence interval alongside the statement that groups "did not differ significantly from" each other to provide further context to the reader.

Common error

Avoid concluding that there is 'no effect' or 'no relationship' simply because the difference "did not differ significantly from" zero or another control. A non-significant result doesn't prove the absence of an effect, only that the effect wasn't strong enough to be detected in the given study.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "did not differ significantly from" functions as a comparative statement, indicating that there is no statistically significant difference between two or more groups, conditions, or variables. Ludwig AI confirms the validity and usability of this phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

92%

Academia

8%

News & Media

0%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "did not differ significantly from" is a common expression, especially in academic and scientific writing, to state that the difference between two or more entities is not statistically significant. Ludwig AI confirms the correctness and usability of this phrase. This phrase indicates an objective and precise language. As evidenced by Ludwig's examples, this phrase is most frequently used in Science and Academia contexts. Alternatives include "were not significantly different from" and "showed no significant difference compared to". When using this phrase, make sure to avoid misinterpreting 'not significant' as 'no effect'; a non-significant result doesn't mean there is no effect, just that it wasn't detected.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were not significantly different from

This alternative replaces "did not differ" with "were not different", maintaining the core meaning of a statistical comparison.

were statistically similar to

This variant emphasizes the statistical nature of the comparison, replacing "did not differ" with "were statistically similar".

showed no significant difference compared to

This rephrasing shifts the focus to the lack of difference, using "showed no significant difference" for emphasis.

displayed no significant deviation from

This alternative highlights the lack of deviation rather than a difference, maintaining the core concept.

exhibited no notable variation from

This phrase suggests that any variations observed were not substantial or noteworthy.

demonstrated equivalence to

This alternative emphasizes the equivalence between the compared items, suggesting they are functionally the same.

were comparable to

Using "comparable to" implies similarity without explicitly stating the absence of a significant difference.

were on par with

Using "were on par with" suggests equivalence or similarity in terms of quality or performance.

were essentially the same as

This alternative conveys a high degree of similarity, suggesting that the entities are practically identical.

were indistinguishable from

This phrase conveys that the items being compared are so alike that they cannot be told apart.

FAQs

How do you use "did not differ significantly from" in a sentence?

This phrase is used to indicate that there was no statistically significant difference between two groups or conditions being compared. For example, "The recovery rates of the two treatment groups "did not differ significantly from" each other."

What are some alternatives to saying "did not differ significantly from"?

You can use alternatives such as "were not significantly different from", "showed no significant difference compared to", or "were comparable to" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "did not significantly differ from"?

While the phrase "did not significantly differ from" is grammatically correct, the phrasing "did not differ significantly from" is more common and considered more natural in scientific and academic writing.

What does it mean when results "did not differ significantly from" the control?

It means that the observed difference between the experimental group and the control group was not large enough to be considered statistically significant. This suggests that the treatment or intervention being tested had no detectable effect, or that the sample size was not large enough to detect a true difference.