did not appoint

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "did not appoint" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when indicating that someone was not designated or assigned to a position or role. Example: "The committee did not appoint a new chairperson during the last meeting."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Nevertheless, his appointment begs the question as to why the board did not appoint someone who had both industry expertise and independence?

Forbes

Mr. Bloomberg did not appoint Mr. Ravitz.

The New York Times

"As a visiting scholar I did not appoint Ed Moloney," he wrote.

The Guardian

Steinbrenner, the Yankees' principal owner, did not appoint Lamoriello, but he strongly supported the decision.

The New York Times - Sports

The court did not appoint Mr. Fortas's firm, then known as Arnold, Fortas & Porter.

The New York Times

"Attorney General Lynch, for example, did not appoint a special prosecutor on the Clinton matter.

The New Yorker

The mayor did not appoint a chief of staff at first, but Mr. Sigmund took the post in March.

The New York Times

Cameron did not appoint a tabloid journalist, even though many of the issues apply to the redtops.

The Guardian

Owens was pleased that the judge did not appoint an outside monitor, as the attorney general had requested.

The New York Times - Sports

Mr. Cellucci, who did not appoint Mr. Kerasiotes but has defended him in the past, took a more understanding view.

The New York Times

But he did not appoint her to lead it because Republicans, viewing her as unfriendly to Wall Street, vowed to block her.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "did not appoint", ensure clarity regarding who had the authority to make the appointment and the context surrounding the decision.

Common error

Avoid using "did not appoint" when describing a situation where the person in question lacked the authority to make the appointment in the first place. It's more appropriate when someone with the power to appoint chooses not to do so.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "did not appoint" functions as a verb phrase expressing negation. It indicates that a specific person or entity refrained from assigning someone to a particular position or role. As Ludwig AI suggests, this phrase is commonly used in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

59%

Encyclopedias

26%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Science

3%

Formal & Business

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "did not appoint" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate that someone was not selected or assigned to a specific role. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage spans various contexts, predominantly in news and media, encyclopedias, and general discussions. While alternatives like "failed to designate" or "declined to nominate" exist, "did not appoint" serves as a clear and direct way to convey the absence of an appointment. When employing this phrase, it's important to specify who held the authority to appoint and the circumstances surrounding the decision. Although the phrase is generally neutral, ensure that the intended meaning aligns with the context to avoid misunderstandings. Considering its prevalence and versatility, "did not appoint" remains a valuable tool in effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

failed to designate

Emphasizes the failure or inability to make an appointment.

declined to nominate

Highlights the refusal to put someone forward for a position.

refrained from selecting

Focuses on the conscious decision to abstain from choosing someone.

passed over for the position

Indicates that someone was considered but not chosen.

left unchosen

Emphasizes that a person or entity remained without being selected.

opted against naming

Highlights the choice not to name someone to a role.

chose not to assign

Focuses on the decision to not allocate a specific task or role.

stopped short of anointing

Suggests a hesitation or refusal to formally endorse someone.

did not pick

Uses a more informal term for selection.

neglected to elect

Emphasizes an oversight or failure to hold an election.

FAQs

How can I use "did not appoint" in a sentence?

You can use "did not appoint" to indicate that someone with the authority to do so chose not to select or assign a person to a specific role or position. For instance, "The mayor "did not appoint" a chief of staff."

What are some alternatives to "did not appoint"?

Alternatives include "failed to designate", "declined to nominate", or "refrained from selecting", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "did not appoint"?

Yes, "did not appoint" is grammatically correct. It follows the standard English sentence structure with the auxiliary verb "did", the negation "not", and the main verb "appoint".

What is the difference between "did not appoint" and "failed to appoint"?

"Did not appoint" simply states that an appointment was not made. "Failed to appoint" suggests an obligation or expectation to appoint someone, which was not fulfilled.