dialogue with

USAGE SUMMARY

"dialogue with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to a conversation or exchange between two or more people. For example: "We had a meaningful dialogue with our team of advisors."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Dialogue with that?

The New York Times

No dialogue with Assad's regime.

The New York Times

"This is a dialogue with yourself".

The New York Times - Magazine

It mandated dialogue with religious groups.

The New York Times

You have a dialogue with yourself.

The New York Times

Dialogue with the opposition has gone nowhere.

The Guardian

"There is no official dialogue with Hefazat".

The New Yorker

My compulsive dialogue with nature took over.

The New York Times

"I don't dialogue with delinquents," he said.

The New York Times

We anticipate continued dialogue with the community.

The New York Times

Mr. Brom advocates dialogue with Hamas.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "dialogue with", ensure that the context implies a two-way exchange of ideas, not just a one-sided communication. For one-sided communications consider other options such as "speaking to" or "presenting to".

Common error

Avoid using "dialogue with" when only one party is speaking or presenting information. Ensure a genuine exchange takes place. Otherwise, consider phrases like "addressing" or "presenting to."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "dialogue with" functions as a prepositional phrase often used to indicate an interaction or exchange between two or more parties. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is grammatically correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

21%

Wiki

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "dialogue with" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to describe an exchange of ideas or a conversation between two or more parties. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English. It appears frequently in news media and scientific contexts, indicating its versatility. When using the phrase, ensure that it accurately reflects a two-way communication, not just a one-sided delivery of information. Consider alternative phrases such as "engage in conversation with" or "have a discussion with" to fine-tune the meaning based on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

engage in conversation with

Replaces "dialogue" with the more descriptive "engage in conversation", emphasizing the active participation.

have a discussion with

Substitutes "dialogue" with "discussion", highlighting a more formal exchange of ideas.

enter into talks with

Focuses on the initiation of a conversation or negotiation.

confer with

Implies a more formal and possibly official consultation.

exchange views with

Emphasizes the sharing of different perspectives.

liaise with

Suggests a collaborative or coordinating interaction.

consult with

Highlights seeking advice or guidance from someone.

have a consultation with

Replaces "dialogue" with "consultation", indicating a formal advisory meeting.

communicate with

A broader term that encompasses various forms of interaction, not just verbal.

interface with

Suggests a formal or technical interaction, often within a system or organization.

FAQs

How to use "dialogue with" in a sentence?

The phrase "dialogue with" is used to describe a conversation or exchange of ideas between two or more parties. For example, "We need to initiate a "dialogue with" the community to understand their concerns."

What can I say instead of "dialogue with"?

You can use alternatives like "engage in conversation with", "have a discussion with", or "confer with" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "dialogue with" or "dialogue between"?

"Dialogue with" is used when referring to a conversation with a specific entity. "Dialogue between" is used when highlighting the interaction between multiple distinct entities. For example: "Dialogue with stakeholders" versus "Dialogue between nations".

What is the difference between "dialogue with" and "communication with"?

"Dialogue with" specifically implies a two-way exchange and active participation, whereas "communication with" is a broader term encompassing any form of conveying information, even one-sided.