diagnosed with

USAGE SUMMARY

"diagnosed with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are discussing a course of medical treatment, for example: "My aunt was recently diagnosed with breast cancer."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I was diagnosed with PTSD.

Independent

He was diagnosed with PTSD.

The Guardian

He was diagnosed with epilepsy.

The Guardian

One was diagnosed with Tourette's syndrome.

The New York Times - Magazine

Jeanrenaud was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis.

The New York Times

But he was diagnosed with leukemia.

The New York Times - Science

He was diagnosed with a rare lymphoma.

The Economist

Papworth was diagnosed with cancer in 2006.

Independent

He was recently diagnosed with throat cancer.

The Economist

She has just been diagnosed with malnutrition.

Independent

There, Daniel was diagnosed with Autistic Disorder.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "diagnosed with", ensure the subject is a person or entity capable of receiving a diagnosis. For example, say "The patient was diagnosed with pneumonia", not "Pneumonia was diagnosed with the patient."

Common error

Avoid using incorrect verb tenses with "diagnosed with". For example, it's correct to say "She was diagnosed with diabetes" (past tense) or "He will be diagnosed with arthritis" (future tense), but not "She is diagnosed with diabetes yesterday."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "diagnosed with" functions as a verb phrase indicating the formal identification of a medical condition by a healthcare professional. It typically connects a patient (the subject) with a specific ailment. Ludwig AI affirms that the usage is correct and very common.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

25%

Wiki

13%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "diagnosed with" is a common and grammatically correct way to indicate that someone has been formally identified as having a medical condition. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase is widely used across diverse contexts, from news reports to scientific publications. While alternatives like "identified as having" or "found to have" exist, "diagnosed with" remains a direct and widely understood way to communicate a medical assessment. Remember to use it accurately by ensuring the subject is a person or entity capable of receiving a diagnosis. Understanding its proper usage enhances clarity and professionalism in both written and spoken communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

confirmed to have

Highlights the validation or confirmation of a diagnosis using "confirmed".

given a diagnosis of

Shifts the focus to the act of giving a diagnosis, rather than receiving one. It also introduces the noun "diagnosis".

identified as having

Uses "identified" instead of "diagnosed", emphasizing the recognition of a condition; includes "as having" for grammatical completeness.

shown to have

Suggests evidence supports the presence of a condition. It's a more passive way of phrasing a diagnosis.

found to have

Emphasizes the discovery of a condition through examination or testing, using "found" and "to have".

assessed as having

Focuses on the evaluation process leading to a diagnosis, using "assessed".

determined to suffer from

Indicates a more formal or clinical assessment of suffering from a condition.

revealed to have

Highlights the uncovering of a condition, often unexpectedly, using "revealed".

recognized as suffering from

Emphasizes the acknowledgment of suffering from a particular condition.

understood to have

Implies a comprehensive understanding or acceptance of the condition after some time.

FAQs

How do I use "diagnosed with" in a sentence?

Use "diagnosed with" to indicate a medical condition that a person or entity has been identified as having. For example, "The child was "diagnosed with autism"".

What are some alternatives to saying "diagnosed with"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives such as "identified as having", "found to have", or "confirmed to have".

Is it correct to say "diagnosed of" instead of "diagnosed with"?

No, the correct preposition to use with "diagnosed" in this context is "with". The phrase "diagnosed of" is grammatically incorrect. Always use "diagnosed with".

What's the difference between "diagnosed with" and "suffering from"?

"Diagnosed with" indicates a formal medical identification of a condition. "Suffering from" simply indicates that someone is experiencing the symptoms of a condition, which may or may not be formally diagnosed.