Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
designating by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "designating by" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used in contexts where one is specifying or identifying something through a particular method or name, but it requires additional context to be grammatically correct. Example: "The committee is designating by a new set of criteria for the award selection process."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
Jupiter is designated by the symbol ♃.
Encyclopedias
Pluto is designated by the symbol ♇.
Encyclopedias
Saturn is designated by the symbol ♄.
Encyclopedias
En passant captures are designated by e.p.
Encyclopedias
Venus is designated by the symbol ♀.
Encyclopedias
It is designated by the symbol ♅.
Encyclopedias
Individuals can purchase a plot designated by the local authority.
News & Media
Many Pakistanis are illiterate so parties are designated by symbols.
News & Media
1988 -- The site is designated by the city's Landmark Preservation Commission.
News & Media
It isn't official, and ours is designated by Congress".
News & Media
Attending schools designated by neighborhood allows for more efficient transport.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using the phrase "designating by". Instead, use "designated by" which follows standard English grammar.
Common error
The phrase "designating by" inverts the correct grammatical structure. Ensure you use "designated by" to maintain clarity and grammatical accuracy.
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
1.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "designating by" is grammatically incorrect. If it were to be used (incorrectly), it would attempt to function as a modifier, specifying a method of designation. Ludwig AI confirms its unsuitability.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "designating by" is considered grammatically incorrect in standard written English. Ludwig AI's analysis confirms this assessment. The correct form is "designated by", which is widely used and accepted. Given its ungrammatical nature, "designating by" should be avoided in all contexts. Instead, consider using alternative phrases like "identified by", "specified by", or "labeled by" depending on the specific context and intended meaning.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
designated by
Reverses the order for standard grammatical structure.
identified by
Uses 'identified' instead of 'designated', implying recognition rather than assignment.
specified by
Replaces 'designating' with 'specified', which focuses on detailed instructions.
characterized by
Changes the focus to describing something's attributes instead of assigning a designation.
labeled by
Uses 'labeled' suggesting a simple naming or classification.
appointed by
If someone is being designated, 'appointed' suggests an official assignment.
chosen by
Emphasizes selection or preference rather than formal designation.
selected by
Similar to 'chosen by', but often implies a more structured selection process.
determined by
Suggests the designation is a result of a calculation or assessment.
defined by
Indicates that the designation establishes the meaning or scope of something.
FAQs
What is the correct way to say "designating by"?
The grammatically correct phrase is "designated by". This follows the standard passive voice construction in English.
Can I use "designating by" in formal writing?
No, "designating by" is not appropriate for formal writing. Use "designated by" or other alternatives such as "specified by" to maintain a professional tone.
What are some alternatives to "designating by"?
Alternatives include phrases like "identified by", "labeled by", or "specified by", depending on the context.
Is there a difference between "designating by" and "designated by"?
"Designating by" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase is "designated by", which means 'assigned or specified by'.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
1.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested