Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

described with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"described with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to introduce a phrase that describes something, usually with an adjective. For example: “The patient's condition was described with alarming accuracy.”.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

(Rabbit undergoes one, described with clinical precision).

Irwin can only be described with superlatives.

News & Media

The New York Times

Thus things can be described with unlimited, infinitesimal precision.

It might be described with fairness as plug ugly.

The two plants were described with impressive specificity.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The pratfall, described with welcome brevity, made me laugh.

News & Media

The New Yorker

He described with pride his process as a writer.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Establishment figures are described with rather less reverence.

News & Media

Independent

Harvey described with academic precision the problems he experienced.

Entrees were described with gushing enthusiasm but little information.

News & Media

The New York Times

The basic relationship is well described with a simple illustration.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "described with" to provide specific and illustrative details about something. This can enhance clarity and engagement in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "described with" in vague or general contexts. Ensure that the description following "described with" adds meaningful and specific information.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "described with" functions as a verb phrase followed by a preposition, serving to introduce a descriptive attribute or characteristic. As Ludwig indicates, it is grammatically correct and suitable for use in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

52%

News & Media

32%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "described with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase for introducing descriptive attributes. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase functions effectively across diverse contexts, with particular prevalence in scientific and news-related writing. While versatile, it's important to use it with precision, ensuring that the descriptive element following "described with" adds specific and meaningful information. Alternatives like "characterized by" or "detailed with" may offer nuanced options depending on the intended emphasis. By following these guidelines, you can effectively leverage "described with" to enhance the clarity and impact of your writing.

FAQs

How can I use "described with" in a sentence?

Use "described with" to introduce a descriptive element. For instance, "The landscape was "described with" vibrant colors" illustrates how the landscape's colors were a key descriptive feature.

What are some alternatives to "described with"?

Alternatives include "characterized by", "detailed with", or "illustrated by". The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "The event was described by enthusiasm" instead of "The event was described with enthusiasm"?

While "described by" can indicate the agent of description, "described with" emphasizes the manner or quality of the description. Therefore, "The event was "described with enthusiasm"" is generally more appropriate when highlighting the descriptive tone.

What's the difference between "described with accuracy" and "described accurately"?

"Described with accuracy" emphasizes that the description possesses accuracy as a quality. "Described accurately" emphasizes that the description was done accurately. The former focuses on the description itself, while the latter focuses on the act of describing.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: