depth of nescience

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "depth of nescience" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a profound lack of knowledge or ignorance about a particular subject or issue. Example: "The depth of nescience surrounding climate change is alarming, as many still deny its existence despite overwhelming evidence."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

On the other hand, Ramanuja, a prominent southern Brahman who held to a qualified monism, argued strenuously against Shankara's dismissal of the world and of individual selves as being mere products of nescience.

Britannica

Steel radials, depth of tread.

The New Yorker

"The shallow depth of field adds drama.

The New York Times

What's the depth of the fly?

The New York Times

A depth of expertise is essential.

The New York Times

The same goes for depth of field.

The New York Times

They have a huge depth of field.

The New York Times

The depth of the collaboration shows.

The New York Times - Arts

What was the depth of the river?

The New Yorker

The depth of personality isn't there".

The New Yorker

Weaknesses: Depth of public engagement.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "depth of nescience", ensure the context clearly indicates a profound lack of knowledge, especially in philosophical or abstract discussions.

Common error

Avoid using "depth of nescience" in casual conversation or everyday scenarios. The phrase is more appropriate for formal or academic writing where a profound or philosophical ignorance is being discussed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "depth of nescience" functions as a noun phrase, typically serving as the object of a verb or preposition. It describes the degree or extent of ignorance, often in abstract or philosophical contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "depth of nescience" is a grammatically correct phrase used to describe a profound lack of knowledge, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. While its frequency is currently limited, its appropriate context lies within formal and abstract discussions. For everyday communication, simpler alternatives like "profound ignorance" or "lack of understanding" may be more suitable. The phrase emphasizes the significance of the ignorance and is best reserved for situations where such emphasis is warranted.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

bottomless nescience

Synonymous, replaces "depth" with "bottomless" for emphasis.

complete lack of understanding

This alternative is a more straightforward way of expressing the absence of knowledge.

unfathomable nescience

This alternative implies that the ignorance is so profound that it cannot be understood or explored.

immense lack of knowledge

Changes "nescience" to "lack of knowledge" and uses "immense" to indicate great size or extent.

profound ignorance

This alternative emphasizes the intensity of the lack of knowledge.

abysmal ignorance

This alternative uses a stronger adjective to describe the lack of knowledge, suggesting it is very severe.

deep-seated unawareness

This alternative highlights a more ingrained or fundamental lack of awareness.

boundless ignorance

This alternative suggests that the ignorance is limitless or extensive.

total unfamiliarity

This alternative focuses on the absence of prior experience or acquaintance with a subject.

vast incomprehension

This alternative emphasizes the scale or scope of what is not understood.

FAQs

How can I use "depth of nescience" in a sentence?

You might use "depth of nescience" to describe someone's profound ignorance on a complex subject. For example: "The depth of nescience surrounding quantum physics is vast among the general public."

What's a simpler way to say "depth of nescience"?

Simpler alternatives include "profound ignorance", "complete lack of understanding", or "deep-seated unawareness", depending on the specific context.

Is "depth of nescience" suitable for informal writing?

No, "depth of nescience" is generally more suitable for formal or academic writing. In informal contexts, it's better to use simpler phrases like "lack of knowledge" or "unfamiliarity with".

How does "depth of nescience" differ from simply saying "ignorance"?

"Depth of nescience" implies a more profound or extensive lack of knowledge than simply saying "ignorance". It suggests a deep-rooted or fundamental unawareness, often in complex or abstract domains.