depth of evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "depth of evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the thoroughness or comprehensiveness of the evidence presented in support of a claim or argument. Example: "The depth of evidence provided in the research study significantly strengthened the author's conclusions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

The depth of evidence makes a compelling case for using TNF inhibitors in established active RA.

Arthritis Research and Therapy

When one tries to consider individual pain conditions then there is a lack of depth of evidence on which to base conclusions.

Clinical interventions in aging

The depth of evidence of H. naledi may provide a perspective on the variation to be expected within fossil hominin taxa (Lordkipanidze et al., 2013; Bermúdez de Castro et al., 2014).

eLife

A secondary purpose was to reflect on the depth of evidence surrounding a key component of patient-centered care, effective communication, by charting the published systematic reviews on effective communication practices.

BMC Health Services Research

Dependability and confirmability of findings were tested by re-reading the data to determine the depth of evidence available for each of the final themes analysed by the research team.

BMJ Open

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

A systematic evidence assessment is one that maps the range and depth of available evidence on a given question, which can then inform the selection of studies for subsequent synthesis.

Archives of Disease in Childhood

The frequent presence of such dissonance, both within individual studies and the evidence as a whole, reflected the quality of the included studies and the depth of the evidence.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

The scene would be meticulously mapped and marked with grids and stakes to measure the depth of any evidence recovered.

The New York Times

UCI had little option but to concur, given the breadth and depth of the evidence USADA compiled, based largely on first-hand accounts of 11 former Armstrong teammates.

The Washington Post

Ioannidis, J. P. A. & Karassa, F. B. The need to consider the wider agenda in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: breadth, timing, and depth of the evidence.

Nature

The administration moved quickly to keep the arrests from provoking the traditional volley of angry denunciations and retaliations, contacting Moscow to indicate the depth of the evidence and its willingness to resolve the situation.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing research findings, use "depth of evidence" to indicate the thoroughness and rigor of the data supporting your conclusions, emphasizing the quality over mere quantity.

Common error

Avoid using "depth of evidence" when you actually mean "breadth of evidence". "Depth" refers to how thoroughly something is investigated, whereas "breadth" refers to how wide the investigation is.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "depth of evidence" functions as a noun phrase typically used as a subject or object in a sentence. According to Ludwig, it is used to describe the thoroughness and extent to which evidence supports a particular claim or argument.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "depth of evidence" is a noun phrase that signifies the thoroughness and strength of supporting information for a claim. Ludwig AI indicates it's grammatically correct and mainly found in formal and scientific contexts such as academic research and news reporting. When using this phrase, it's important to differentiate "depth" (thoroughness) from "breadth" (range) to ensure clarity. Common alternatives include "strength of the evidence" and "comprehensiveness of the evidence". The examples provided by Ludwig highlight the phrase's usage in various source categories. Ludwig.ai highlights that phrase is correct and usable in written English.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

strength of the evidence

Focuses on the persuasiveness and reliability of the evidence.

comprehensiveness of the evidence

Emphasizes the thoroughness and completeness of the evidence presented.

extent of the evidence

Highlights the scope and range of the available evidence.

volume of evidence

Refers to the quantity and amount of evidence available.

weight of evidence

Similar to 'strength', but implies a cumulative impact of multiple pieces of evidence.

rigor of the evidence

Emphasizes the meticulousness and methodological soundness of the evidence.

thoroughness of the evidence

Indicates how exhaustive and detailed the evidence is.

scope of the evidence

Focuses on the breadth and variety of the evidence presented.

intensity of the evidence

Highlights the degree or forcefulness of the supporting evidence.

detail of the evidence

Emphasizes the granularity and specificity of the supporting evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "depth of evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "depth of evidence" to describe how thoroughly a claim has been investigated or supported. For example, "The "depth of evidence" supporting this theory is substantial."

What are some alternatives to "depth of evidence"?

Alternatives include "strength of the evidence", "comprehensiveness of the evidence", or "extent of the evidence". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is "depth of evidence" a formal or informal phrase?

"Depth of evidence" is suitable for both formal and academic writing, as well as for more neutral contexts such as news reporting. Its use indicates a considered assessment of supporting data.

What's the difference between "depth of evidence" and "breadth of evidence"?

"Depth of evidence" refers to the thoroughness of investigation into a specific point, whereas "breadth of evidence" refers to the range of different types of evidence supporting a claim. Using the correct term ensures clarity and precision.