deprived of

USAGE SUMMARY

"deprived of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing something that has been taken away or denied. For example: "The family had been deprived of the basic necessities of life."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

"People are deprived of their freedom.

The New York Times

Defeated, he was deprived of his chieftainship.

The Economist

Were they deprived of hope or education?

Independent

Why are we deprived of peace?

The Economist

Some get upset when deprived of it.

The Economist

They would be deprived of electronic distractions.

The Economist

Deprived of her voice, she wasn't deprived of meaning.

The Guardian - Film

Cornell students were merely deprived of sleep.

Cornell University

Democrats were thus deprived of powerful videotape.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Figures deprived of heads sink into despair.

The New York Times - Arts

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Was Ross Ulbricht Deprived of Due Process?

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Ensure that the context clearly identifies both the entity being deprived and the resource or right they are lacking. This avoids ambiguity and strengthens the impact of your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "deprived of" when simply describing a lack. The phrase implies an active taking away or withholding, not just a natural absence. For a simple absence, consider using "lacking" or "without" instead.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "deprived of" functions as a passive verb construction indicating that a subject has been denied something. Ludwig shows that this phrase connects a subject with a lost attribute or possession. It typically implies a negative consequence or disadvantage for the subject.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Academia

25%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "deprived of" is a versatile and grammatically sound construction used to indicate that something has been taken away or is lacking. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is appropriate for general use. Its frequency across diverse sources like News & Media, Academia, and Science indicates its widespread acceptance and applicability. When using this phrase, ensure that the context clearly shows both the entity being deprived and what they are lacking to maximize clarity and impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

stripped of

Suggests a forceful or deliberate removal of something, often with negative connotations.

bereft of

Emphasizes a sense of loss or absence, similar to "deprived of" but often used in more emotional or literary contexts.

devoid of

Emphasizes a complete absence of something, often used for abstract qualities or characteristics.

denied

Highlights the act of withholding something from someone, emphasizing the active denial.

divested of

A more formal and legalistic term for being deprived of something, often referring to rights or possessions.

lacking in

Focuses on the absence of a quality or attribute, rather than the act of being deprived.

wanting in

Highlights the inadequacy or deficiency of something, similar to "lacking in".

without

A simpler and more direct way of expressing the absence of something.

short on

Implies a deficiency in quantity or amount, rather than a complete absence.

missing

Indicates that something is absent or not present, without necessarily implying deprivation.

FAQs

How can I use "deprived of" in a sentence?

The phrase "deprived of" indicates that someone or something has been denied or has lost something important. For instance, "The refugees were "deprived of" their homes" or "The plant was "deprived of" sunlight".

What's a formal alternative to "deprived of"?

A more formal alternative to "deprived of" could be "bereft of" or "divested of", depending on the context. For example, instead of "They were "deprived of" their rights", you could say "They were "bereft of" their rights" or "They were "divested of" their rights".

Is it correct to say 'deprived from' instead of "deprived of"?

No, the correct preposition to use with "deprived" is "of", not "from". The correct phrase is ""deprived of"". Using "from" is grammatically incorrect.

What's the difference between "deprived of" and "lacking"?

"Deprived of" implies that something has been taken away or withheld, whereas "lacking" simply means that something is missing or absent. For example, you are "deprived of" freedom because someone imprisoned you, but you are "lacking in" motivation if you simply don't feel like doing something.