Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

definite causality

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "definite causality" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing clear and specific cause-and-effect relationships in various fields such as science, philosophy, or logic. Example: "In this experiment, we observed definite causality between the temperature increase and the rate of reaction."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Such a retrospective survey can not allow to conclude definite causality between antenatal ultrasound scan and CS.

In terms of interpreting whether the results reported here specifically reflect improvements after implementation of guidelines, with this observational design we cannot infer a definite causality link, although all efforts were undertaken to widely and comprehensively distribute guidelines as described in the methods.

Science

BMC Cancer

However, the cross sectional design adopted herein cannot prove definite causality and it is likely that the number of hospital admissions as well as the length of hospitalisation is mediated by many different factors, which have to be investigated in relevant trials.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

The cross-sectional design of data collection does not allow definite conclusions on causality.

Science

Plosone

This fact, and validity issues inherent in our observational design, hinders a definite conclusion concerning causality.

The main limitation of our study is its cross-sectional design, which does not allow us to draw definite conclusions on causality.

First, it was based on a cross-sectional design, which makes it impossible to draw definite conclusions about causality of the associations found.

Thus, the results of the present study suggest a possible vancomycin exposure-toxicity relationship but definite proof of causality will require a blinded, prospective trial.

However, since our study did not include an intervention aimed to affect leptin levels, this does not provide definite proof of causality.

First, due to the cross-sectional nature of the datasets, it is not possible to make any definite inference on causality.

The study sample size and the cross-sectional design without an unexposed control group limits the generalisation of the results and prevents us from drawing definite conclusions on causality.

Science

BMJ Open
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing research findings, clearly state the limitations in establishing "definite causality", especially in observational studies. Acknowledge potential confounding factors.

Common error

Avoid implying "definite causality" based solely on correlation. Just because two events occur together doesn't mean one necessarily causes the other. Further investigation is needed.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "definite causality" functions as a noun phrase, typically used to describe a relationship where a specific cause leads directly to a specific effect. Ludwig examples show it is often used to discuss limitations in research design.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

67%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "definite causality" is a noun phrase used to describe a clear and established cause-and-effect relationship. According to Ludwig, it is primarily used in scientific and, to a lesser extent, news contexts. Due to its rarity, it is important to ensure its appropriate use in writing, acknowledging the limitations of observational studies and avoiding assumptions of causality from correlation. Related phrases such as "clear causation" or "established causality" can be used as alternatives depending on the intended nuance. While Ludwig AI affirms its grammatical correctness, writers should be mindful of the phrase's formal and scientific register.

FAQs

How is "definite causality" used in scientific research?

In scientific research, "definite causality" implies a clearly established cause-and-effect relationship, often demonstrated through controlled experiments. It means that changes in one variable directly and reliably produce changes in another.

What study designs can help establish "definite causality"?

Randomized controlled trials are the gold standard for establishing "definite causality". Longitudinal studies and interventional studies can also provide stronger evidence of causality than cross-sectional studies.

What are some alternatives to using the phrase "definite causality"?

Alternatives include "clear causation", "established causality", or "proven causality", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Why is it difficult to prove "definite causality" in observational studies?

Observational studies are limited in establishing "definite causality" because they cannot control for all potential confounding variables. Correlations observed in observational studies may be due to other factors, not a direct cause-and-effect relationship.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: