deep with

USAGE SUMMARY

"deep with" is not an idiom or phrase that is commonly used in written English.
You could instead use the phrase "deeply rooted" or "deeply entrenched" to mean something established for a long time. Example: The rivalry between the two teams was deeply rooted in their shared history.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

"Deep, with overall team speed.

The New York Times - Sports

Things go deep with him.

The New Yorker

Hockey runs deep with the Palazzos.

The New York Times

Really dig deep with the research.

The Guardian

The state's ties run deep with the Swisher family.

The New York Times - Sports

Another was packed two layers deep with science-fiction paperbacks.

The New Yorker

The crisis goes deep, with years of structural problems.

The Guardian

That early deal-making ran deep with Lloyd.

The Guardian - Arts

The love of guns runs deep with Arizonans.

The Guardian

WINE LIST Broad and deep, with sommeliers standing by.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

"We're so much deeper with talent".

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider using alternatives like "rich in", "filled with", or other similar phrases to improve grammatical clarity and precision. The phrase "deep with" is not always considered standard English.

Common error

Avoid using "deep with" in formal writing. While it appears in various sources, it's often perceived as non-standard. Opt for more established phrases to convey depth or intensity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "deep with" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase attempting to describe a state or condition characterized by a significant amount or intensity of something. Ludwig AI suggests that it is not a commonly used idiom.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Science

24%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "deep with" appears in various sources, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically questionable. It attempts to convey abundance or intensity but might lack precision. For clearer and more standard English, consider using alternatives such as "rich in", "filled with", or other similar expressions. Its usage spans from news and media to scientific contexts, yet formality is best achieved through rephrasing and adopting more widely accepted idioms.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

rich in

Focuses on abundance and fullness, emphasizing a quality or element present in great quantity, while "deep with" highlights the depth or intensity of that presence.

filled with

Implies a state of being completely occupied or permeated by something, whereas "deep with" suggests a more profound or inherent characteristic.

imbued with

Conveys the sense of being deeply permeated or saturated with a quality or feeling, differing from "deep with" by emphasizing the process of infusion.

profoundly affected by

Highlights the significant impact or influence of something, whereas "deep with" focuses on the inherent quality or characteristic.

steeped in

Suggests immersion or saturation in a particular atmosphere or quality, unlike "deep with" which simply denotes the presence of depth.

replete with

Focuses on being fully or abundantly supplied, changing the emphasis from depth to completeness.

saturated with

Conveys the idea of being completely soaked or permeated, highlighting intensity rather than just depth.

thoroughly investigated

Emphasizes a comprehensive examination or exploration, shifting the focus from depth to completeness of investigation.

heavily influenced by

Highlights the strong impact or effect of something, where "deep with" emphasizes the inherent quality.

laden with

Suggests being burdened or weighed down by something, unlike "deep with" which doesn't necessarily imply a negative connotation.

FAQs

Is "deep with" grammatically correct?

Ludwig AI considers "deep with" grammatically questionable. While it appears in some contexts, it's advisable to use more standard expressions like "rich in" or "filled with" for clarity.

What can I say instead of "deep with" to describe abundance?

You can use alternatives like "rich in", "filled with", or "replete with" depending on the context.

How to use "deep with" in a sentence correctly?

While some sources use "deep with", consider rephrasing for better clarity. For example, instead of "The forest is deep with pine needles", try "The forest floor is covered in pine needles".

What's the difference between "deep with" and "deeply rooted"?

"Deeply rooted" implies something established or ingrained over time, whereas "deep with" attempts to describe a current state of abundance or intensity. However, "deep with" is often grammatically awkward; consider alternatives.