decreased with

USAGE SUMMARY

"decreased with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a decrease in quantity, size, intensity, or severity over a period of time. For example, "The number of students in the class decreased with each passing year."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Science & Research

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

However the superiority decreased with multiple doses.

Nature

Acceptance decreased with increasing age.

The Journal of Pediatrics

This ratio decreased with temperature.

Catalysis Today

Spore settlement decreased with an increase in ERII.

Nature

Soil bacterial and fungal richness decreased with continuous coffee cropping.

Nature

Soil C content on the other hand, decreased with depth.

Nature

PyOM pH also decreased with oxidation (Fig. 1c).

Nature

Importantly, postural displacement percentage also decreased with increased biomechanical constraints.

Nature

The number of DEGs decreased with time post-transplant.

Stanford University

However, cell viability decreased with increasing acetylation.

Biomaterials

Response times decreased with analyte concentration.

Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "decreased with", ensure the relationship between the decreasing element and the influencing factor is clear and logical. For example, "Enthusiasm decreased with each failed attempt" provides a clear cause-and-effect relationship.

Common error

Avoid assuming that because something "decreased with" another factor, the latter directly caused the decrease. Ensure that the relationship is causal and not merely correlational. For example, don't say "Sales decreased with the introduction of the new logo" without evidence that the logo caused the decrease; other factors may be at play.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "decreased with" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating a relationship between a decrease and another factor. It highlights how the reduction of something is associated with or influenced by the state or change of something else. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

48%

Academia

20%

News & Media

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

20%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "decreased with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used prepositional phrase that describes a correlation between a reduction and another factor. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's correct and usable nature. Its primary function is to indicate a relationship where one element reduces in association with another. Common in science, academia, and news media, it maintains a neutral to formal register. When using "decreased with", ensure you're not implying causation where only correlation exists. Alternatives include "declined alongside" and "reduced in proportion to", depending on the specific nuance needed.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

declined alongside

This alternative implies a simultaneous decrease, suggesting both elements are reducing in tandem.

reduced in proportion to

This suggests a direct relationship where the reduction is scaled based on the other variable.

diminished as a result of

This highlights a cause-and-effect relationship, where the decrease is a consequence of something else.

lessened in relation to

This indicates a comparative decrease, showing how the element reduces when compared to another.

dropped corresponding to

This suggests a direct and immediate response in reduction based on the other variable.

fell in line with

This implies that the decrease aligns with a trend or expectation set by the other factor.

contracted due to

This indicates a shrinking or reduction as a direct effect of the other variable.

subsided in response to

This suggests a calming or weakening effect as a reaction to the other factor.

receded concurrent with

This implies a gradual withdrawal or decrease happening at the same time as the other element.

abated as a function of

This indicates a reduction that is mathematically or predictably related to the other variable.

FAQs

How can I use "decreased with" in a sentence?

You can use "decreased with" to show a relationship where one thing reduces as another changes. For example, "Efficiency "decreased with" each new software update" demonstrates a negative correlation.

What are some alternatives to "decreased with"?

Alternatives include phrases like "declined alongside", "reduced in proportion to", or "diminished as a result of" depending on the specific context you want to convey.

Is it always accurate to say something "decreased with" something else?

No, it's important to ensure that the relationship isn't just correlational. Just because two things change together doesn't mean one causes the other. Always look for a logical or causal connection.

What's the difference between "decreased with" and "decreased by"?

"Decreased with" indicates a relationship or trend alongside another factor, while "decreased by" specifies a quantifiable amount of reduction. For example, "Productivity "decreased with" stress", versus "Productivity "decreased with" 20% after the change".