Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

data were scrutinized for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "data were scrutinized for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the examination or analysis of data to identify specific information or patterns. Example: "In the study, data were scrutinized for trends in consumer behavior over the past decade."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Collected data were scrutinized for the presence of potential duplicates (based on reported country of residency, socio-demographic characteristics, date and exact time of questionnaire completion) but none were identified.

Thematic analysis, using the constant comparison technique (14), was used to scrutinize the data to identify and analyse patterns across the dataset and the data were scrutinized for negative cases.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

In the United States, economic data was scrutinized for any sign of strength in the country's recovery.

News & Media

The New York Times

Every piece of data is scrutinized for hints as to what steps the Fed might take at the June 29-30 meeting.

News & Media

Forbes

Data were scrutinized and carefully compared to elucidate the explosion characteristics.

Age, sex, type of surgery, and preoperative EQ-5D data were scrutinized.

That data is scrutinized by economists and financial markets for insights into whether the economy is emerging from a prolonged slump.

News & Media

The New York Times

A further 212 families containing an individual with SLI were scrutinized for abnormalities using SNP data from the Illumina HumanOmniExpress beadchip (see Fig. 1 for examples of how the abnormalities were visualized).

They were scrutinized for relevant information.

The collected data is scrutinized manually before its entry into the computer.

These records were scrutinized for documentation of symptoms and signs specified in the PAR and data abstracted.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "data were scrutinized for", clearly specify what you were looking for during the scrutiny process to provide context and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "data were scrutinized for" if a simpler term like "analyzed" or "examined" adequately conveys the meaning. Overusing "scrutinized" can make your writing sound unnecessarily formal or complex.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

Function: The phrase "data were scrutinized for" acts as a passive construction, indicating that the data underwent a detailed and critical examination to identify specific features or anomalies. This usage is supported by Ludwig AI, confirming its correctness.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "data were scrutinized for" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to convey a detailed and critical examination of data. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's correct for written English, often appearing in science and news media contexts. When using this phrase, remember to specify what the data was being examined for to provide clarity and avoid overuse, opting for simpler alternatives like "analyzed" or "examined" when appropriate. Ludwig's examples illustrate its application in identifying duplicates or signs of economic recovery.

FAQs

How can I use "data were scrutinized for" in a sentence?

Use "data were scrutinized for" when you want to emphasize a detailed and critical examination of data to find specific patterns or information. For example, "The "data were scrutinized for" any signs of fraudulent activity".

What are some alternatives to "data were scrutinized for"?

You can use alternatives like "data were examined for", "data were analyzed for", or "data were checked for" depending on the specific context and the level of detail involved in the examination.

When is it appropriate to use "data were scrutinized for" instead of "data were analyzed for"?

"Data were scrutinized for" implies a more critical and detailed examination compared to "data were analyzed for". Use "scrutinized" when you're looking for something specific or potentially problematic within the data.

What kind of data is typically "scrutinized"?

The phrase ""data were scrutinized for"" is usually applied to data that requires careful and detailed examination, such as financial records, scientific findings, or legal documents.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: