Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

data were correlated

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "data were correlated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts involving statistical analysis or research findings where relationships between data sets are being discussed. Example: "In our study, we found that the data were correlated, indicating a significant relationship between the variables."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The data were correlated by Spearman rank order correlation.

The ICP and CPP data were correlated to PI and the correlation coefficient calculated.

The data were correlated by the equation:.

The data were correlated by the dimensionless equation:.

The data were correlated by a dimensionless mass transfer equation.

The MRI data were correlated with overall module performance.

All experimental data were correlated with the NRTL model.

The equilibrium data were correlated with the Langmuir isotherm model.

All data were correlated in the form of dimensionless equations.

These data were correlated with normative data from healthy subjects.

The mass transfer data were correlated by dimensionless equations.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "data were correlated", ensure the method of correlation (e.g., Pearson correlation, Spearman's rho) is specified for clarity. For instance, "Data were correlated using Spearman's Rho".

Common error

Avoid using "data were correlated" without specifying what variables were correlated with each other. For example, instead of saying "The data were correlated", specify "The MRI data were correlated with overall module performance."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "data were correlated" functions as a statement indicating a statistical relationship has been identified between different sets of data. As seen in Ludwig, this phrase is commonly used in scientific and research contexts to report findings where connections between variables have been established.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Unknown/unmatched sources

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "data were correlated" is a common and grammatically correct expression, primarily used in scientific and research contexts to indicate a statistical relationship between datasets. As Ludwig examples show, its purpose is to inform readers that an analysis revealed a connection. While very frequent, it's important to specify the variables being correlated and the method used to avoid vague statements. Alternative phrases include "data exhibited correlation" and "data sets showed a relationship". The Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is usable in written English, particularly when discussing relationships between data sets.

FAQs

How do I use "data were correlated" in a sentence?

Use "data were correlated" to describe a statistical relationship you've found between two or more sets of data. For example, "Clinical "data were correlated" to MRI findings".

What does it mean when "data were correlated"?

It means that a statistical analysis was performed to determine if there's a relationship between different sets of data, and a relationship was found. The type of correlation (e.g., positive, negative) should ideally be specified.

Which is more accurate, "data were correlated" or "data showed correlation"?

Both are grammatically correct. "Data showed correlation" emphasizes the data's inherent characteristic, while ""data were correlated"" focuses on the action of correlating the data.

What can I say instead of "data were correlated"?

You can use alternatives like "data exhibited correlation", "data sets showed a relationship", or "data displayed a correlation" depending on the nuance you want to convey.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: