Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
data were chosen for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "data were chosen for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the selection criteria or purpose behind the data that has been selected for a specific analysis or study. Example: "In this research, data were chosen for their relevance to the study's objectives and the demographic diversity they represent."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
7 human-written examples
These methods of generating and averaging 4D data were chosen for a couple of reasons.
Science
The two best performing features in classifying validation data were chosen for further training.
Science
These data were chosen for two reasons.
For demonstration purposes, several sections of data were chosen for analysis with the continuous Bayesian method.
Science
Some Ras1CA-upregulated DEGs, which are consistent in both transcriptomic results and qPCR data, were chosen for inhibitor treatment experiments by qPCR analysis to examine their expression levels.
Science
NeoKISS data were chosen for comparison to the data from the PNSN owing to the meticulous research methods employed in this surveillance program.
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
53 human-written examples
50% of all data was chosen for training, 25% for testing and 25% for validation.
Science
60% of data was chosen for training the model and the rest for testing.
Science
How should appropriate boundary data be chosen for the Helmholtz equation or modified Helmholtz equation of first order?
Science
The ECHAM 5 data was chosen for the purpose of data consistency as the WETTREG2010 data did also employ ECHAM 5 runs for the boundary conditions.
In the treatment of the thermogravimetric data, several kinetic models are tested and the model that fits the data is chosen for the determination of the kinetic parameters.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using the phrase "data were chosen for", clearly state the criteria that influenced the selection process. This adds transparency and strengthens the validity of your analysis.
Common error
Avoid using "data were chosen for" without specifying who or what did the choosing. Make sure the agent responsible for the selection is clear from the context to prevent confusion.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "data were chosen for" functions as a passive construction indicating that data underwent a selection process for a specific reason or application. Ludwig AI confirms the grammatical correctness and usability of this phrase in written English.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "data were chosen for" is a grammatically correct passive construction used to explain why specific data was selected. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and indicates it's best suited for formal contexts, especially in scientific and academic writing. While not extremely common, its usage is clear and direct. Remember to clearly state selection criteria for maximum clarity. Alternatives like "data were selected for" or "data were designated for" offer subtle variations in meaning.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
data were selected for
Replaces "chosen" with "selected", a direct synonym, maintaining the passive voice and meaning.
data were picked for
Uses "picked" as a more informal synonym for "chosen", still indicating selection.
data were designated for
Emphasizes that the data was specifically assigned for a purpose.
data were earmarked for
Suggests the data was set aside or reserved for a particular use.
data were intended for
Focuses on the original purpose or intention behind selecting the data.
data were suited for
Highlights the suitability or appropriateness of the data for a given task.
data were tailored for
Implies the data was specifically modified or adjusted to fit a particular need.
the data selection was for
Restructures the sentence to emphasize the selection process, while retaining the purpose.
the rationale for the data choice was
Highlights the explanation or reasons behind choosing that specific data
data were deemed appropriate for
Replaces "chosen" with "deemed appropriate", highlighting the assessment of data suitability.
FAQs
How can I use "data were chosen for" in a sentence?
You can use "data were chosen for" to indicate the purpose or reason behind selecting specific data. For example, "The "data were chosen for" their relevance to the study's objectives".
What is a more formal alternative to "data were chosen for"?
A more formal alternative is "data were selected for". Both phrases convey the same meaning, but "selected" carries a slightly more professional tone.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "data were chosen for"?
The choice between active and passive voice depends on the context. If the chooser is important, use the active voice (e.g., "We chose the data for..."). If the data and its purpose are the focus, the passive voice ("data were chosen for...") is suitable.
What can I say instead of "data were chosen for"?
You can use alternatives like "data were selected for", "data were picked for", or "data were designated for" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested