Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

damaging factor for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "damaging factor for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe an element or aspect that negatively impacts a situation or outcome. Example: "The lack of funding has become a damaging factor for the success of the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

"Emotional neglect" from disengaged parents is also a damaging factor for children's development, says the study.

News & Media

BBC

Furthermore, agglomerated IrO2 nanoparticles can have an adverse effect on the oxygen reduction reaction by covering the active surface area of the Pt/C cathode catalyst, which is a damaging factor for the intrinsic performance of PEMFC.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

The first term in the parentheses indicated the damage factor for respiratory (Inorganic), while the second is that for acidification.

Table 9 Building characteristics and damage factor for the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake Site Building type Observed damage classification Approx. natural frequency Damage factor CC1 Residential Heavy 1.8 407.40 CC2 Residential Heavy 0.6 179.62 CC3 Warehouse Heavy 3.4 172.98 Commercial Moderate/heavyeavy 2.3 93.99 CC5 Residential Light 1.2 70.24.

Involving the damage factors of single pre-damage conditions, which include pre-deformation and pre-corrosion effects, the damage factor for pre-corroded multiaxial fatigue after pre-deformation is deduced.

Table 7 Building characteristics and damage factor for the 2011 Christchurch earthquake Site Building name Observed damage classification Approx. natural frequency Damage factor C1 Christchurch Cathedral Complete 0.9 9.14 CTVCTV Building Complete 2.1 8.94 C3 Grand Chancellor Moderate/heavy 0.4 6.86 C4 TVNZ Building Heavy 2.8 6.45 C5 Residential House Light 5.4 3.87.

On the other hand, a slightly higher damage factor of 341 for T2 yields a "Moderate" damage.

For instance, a damage factor of 400 would represent the category of "Heavy" damage to buildings for all case studies, except the 2011 Christchurch earthquake that showed a damage factor of 9 for complete collapse.

Therefore, the advanced failure criteria and damage factors for braided composites need to be investigated further, and more efforts are unquestionably needed in the future.

Similar to the earlier case studies on the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and 2007 Bengkulu earthquake, the analysis produced higher damage factors for more severely damaged buildings observed in the field.

As shown from the graph, varying the damage factor used for the simulation would have little or no effect on the outcome of the simulation.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "damaging factor for", ensure the context clearly identifies what is being damaged and how the factor contributes to that damage. Be specific about the relationship.

Common error

Avoid using "damaging factor for" in overly broad statements without providing specific details. For example, instead of saying 'Poor communication is a damaging factor for relationships', specify which aspects of communication are damaging and how they cause damage.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "damaging factor for" functions as a noun phrase that identifies a specific element or aspect as contributing negatively to a particular situation or outcome. Ludwig confirms the usability of the phrase.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "damaging factor for" is a grammatically correct phrase used to identify an element that negatively impacts a situation. While Ludwig identifies it as usable, the examples available demonstrate a relatively low frequency in common language. Its usage is largely concentrated in scientific and journalistic contexts. The phrase serves to emphasize the detrimental role of a specific factor. Consider alternatives like "detrimental influence on" or "harmful element for" to achieve similar meanings with slight variations in emphasis.

FAQs

How can I use "damaging factor for" in a sentence?

Use "damaging factor for" to point out a specific element that contributes negatively to a particular outcome. For example, "Emotional neglect is a "damaging factor for" children's development".

What are some alternatives to "damaging factor for"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "detrimental influence on", "harmful element for", or "negative impact on".

Is it more appropriate to say "damaging factor to" or "damaging factor for"?

"Damaging factor for" is generally preferred because it correctly indicates that the factor is causing damage for a particular thing or outcome. "Damaging factor to" can sound awkward and is less common.

What's the difference between "damaging factor" and "risk factor"?

While both terms indicate potential harm, a "damaging factor" implies a more direct and active cause of harm, whereas a "risk factor" simply increases the likelihood of a negative outcome without necessarily being the direct cause.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: