damage to standards

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "damage to standards" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the negative impact on established norms or criteria, such as in quality control or regulatory compliance. Example: "The recent changes in policy have led to significant damage to standards in our manufacturing process."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Almost one fifth of school spending could be cut without any damage to standards, a think tank claims.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

The rationale for these so-called power-injectable PICCs was the concern of potential mechanical damage to standard polyurethane and silicon PICCs when used during high-pressure injection.

Critical Care

Whatever the damage to living standards, from Whirlpool's point of view, its strategy in acquiring Maytag was impeccable.

The New York Times

He added: "Labour is unequivocal in its rejection of the profit schools model that has done so much damage to education standards and raise inequality elsewhere.

Independent

Hawaii provides an example of how even a failed antievolution campaign can do subtle damage to science standards.

Evolution: Education and Outreach

"The 10percentt plan does much more damage to your admissions standards than considering race alone".

The New York Times

People rightly want our political leaders – on all sides - to concentrate on minimising the damage to jobs, living standards and our savings from the banking crisis.

The Guardian

The principle hypothesis is that tight control of inflammation in PsA will lead to an improvement in patients' disease activity and a reduction in radiological damage compared to standard care alone.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

If the policy is successful it will be highly damaging to living standards as inflation eats away at pay levels.

The Guardian - Opinion

As this behavior is damaging to the standard "division of labor" on smartphones, it will likely only decrease due to more forceful redirection of web maps to the native mapping app (if compatible, which is another issue altogether).

TechCrunch

If the United States quietly permits Guantánamo to become an internment camp for citizens of Yemen - a single, conspicuously less powerful nation - it will do lasting damage to regional human rights standards.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing the impact of policies or actions on established benchmarks, use "damage to standards" to highlight a tangible negative effect, especially when quantifying the extent of the "damage" is possible.

Common error

Avoid using "damage to standards" in casual conversation or informal writing. Opt for simpler alternatives like "harm" or "negative impact" to maintain a natural and appropriate tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "damage to standards" functions as a noun phrase, where "damage" acts as the head noun and "to standards" serves as a prepositional phrase modifying it. It describes the act or result of negatively affecting established benchmarks or criteria. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is considered correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "damage to standards" is a grammatically sound way to express a negative impact on established benchmarks or criteria. While not extremely common, Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. It is most frequently found in News & Media and Science contexts, indicating a neutral register. When writing, consider the context and choose simpler alternatives like "negative impact on standards" for informal settings. Remember that "damage to standards" often suggests a tangible and measurable negative effect.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

degradation of standards

Replaces "damage" with "degradation", emphasizing a gradual decline in quality.

erosion of standards

Substitutes "damage" with "erosion", highlighting a slow and steady weakening of established norms.

impairment of standards

Uses "impairment" instead of "damage", suggesting a weakening or diminishing of standards.

harm to standards

Replaces "damage" with "harm", offering a more direct and less nuanced alternative.

detriment to standards

Substitutes "damage" with "detriment", indicating a loss or disadvantage to established criteria.

negative impact on standards

Replaces "damage" with "negative impact", providing a more neutral and analytical tone.

adverse effect on standards

Uses "adverse effect" instead of "damage", emphasizing the unwanted or harmful consequence.

undermining of standards

Substitutes "damage" with "undermining", suggesting a deliberate or unintentional weakening of standards from beneath.

compromised standards

Implies that standards have been weakened or made less effective.

weakening of standards

Focuses on the process of standards becoming less strict or effective.

FAQs

How can I use "damage to standards" in a sentence?

You can use "damage to standards" to describe a negative impact on established norms or criteria. For example, "The budget cuts caused significant "damage to standards" in education".

What are some alternatives to saying "damage to standards"?

Alternatives include "degradation of standards", "erosion of standards", or "harm to standards", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is "damage to standards" formal or informal?

"Damage to standards" leans towards a more formal register. In casual contexts, consider using simpler alternatives like "negative impact on standards".

What's the difference between "damage to standards" and "harm to standards"?

While similar, "damage to standards" often implies a more tangible and measurable negative effect, whereas "harm to standards" can be a more general term for negative consequences.