damage to research

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "damage to research" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing negative impacts or harm that has occurred to research efforts or findings. Example: "The recent funding cuts have caused significant damage to research in the field of renewable energy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

A deal on drugs for poor countries should be a win-win play - better healthcare, no risk of damage to research and development of new drugs, and a sign of good intent from the west that might help kickstart the talks.

The Guardian - Business

When the fog clears, some agencies may find that the shutdown caused irreversible damage to research.

Science Magazine

Although these methods can be used to determine the weathering degree of rocks, they are limited in that they require numerous field tests to determine global weathering degree and may result in unnecessary damage to research objects.

Heritage Science

Neal Sullivan, head of NSF's Office of Polar Programs, said the biggest challenge is to "minimize the damage to research" from any program cuts and to "keep the community intact" while the new station is built.

Science Magazine

This insurance provides cover in case of damage to research subjects through injury or death caused by the study.

BMC Geriatrics

Maastricht University and KU Leuven have an insurance covering damage to research subjects through injury or death caused by the study, that becomes apparent within 4 years after the end of the study.

BMC Family Practice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

The government also plans to extend antiharassment laws to apply to all employees of an organization rather than specific individuals and may outlaw acts that cause economic damage to research-related operations.

Science Magazine

This study provides an analysis of two important effects associated with research misconduct resulting in the retraction of scientific publications: financial costs to funding agencies and damage to the research careers of those who commit misconduct.

eLife

They are very bad, and risk doing great damage to our research base.

The Guardian

Vietnam, however, called the damage to the research cable premeditated and said it was the second such confrontation in recent weeks.

The New York Times

"The damage to the research base in UK universities across a number of disciplines is out of all proportion to the cost saving," said Prof Jon Goff, a University of London physicist.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing the impact of events or policies on research, use "damage to research" to clearly indicate a negative effect on the research process or its outcomes. Be specific about the type of damage, such as "financial damage", "irreversible damage", or "economic damage".

Common error

Don't use "damage to research" without specifying the cause or nature of the damage. Instead of saying "the shutdown caused damage to research", specify what type of damage occurred: "the shutdown caused irreversible "damage to research" data".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "damage to research" functions as a noun phrase that describes the negative impact or harm inflicted upon research activities, infrastructure, or outcomes. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. Examples show its use in contexts ranging from funding cuts to ethical breaches.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

43%

News & Media

43%

Formal & Business

14%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "damage to research" is used to describe negative impacts on research activities. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. While uncommon, it appears in diverse contexts, predominantly in scientific and news publications. The phrase can refer to financial setbacks, reputational harm, or any adverse effect hindering research progress. When using this phrase, it's important to specify the type and cause of the damage for clarity. Alternatives like "harm to research efforts" or "detriment to research activities" can be used depending on the desired nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

harm to research efforts

Replaces "damage" with "harm", focusing on the research efforts themselves.

detriment to research activities

Substitutes "damage" with "detriment", emphasizing a negative impact on research activities.

negative impact on research

Uses a more general term, "negative impact", to describe the effect on research.

adverse effect on research

Replaces "damage" with "adverse effect", highlighting the detrimental nature of the impact on research.

impairment of research quality

Focuses specifically on the quality of research being affected.

disruption of research programs

Emphasizes the interruption and disturbance caused to research programs.

setback for research progress

Highlights the slowing or reversal of progress in research.

hindrance to research endeavors

Focuses on obstacles and impediments to research endeavors.

jeopardy to research integrity

Highlights the risk to the ethical and methodological soundness of research.

undermining of research foundations

Emphasizes the weakening of the fundamental principles and support of research.

FAQs

How can I use "damage to research" in a sentence?

You can use "damage to research" to describe negative impacts on research activities, such as "The budget cuts caused significant "damage to research" in the university" or "The scandal resulted in lasting "damage to research" integrity".

What are some alternatives to saying "damage to research"?

Alternatives include "harm to research efforts", "detriment to research activities", or "negative impact on research". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "harm to research" instead of "damage to research"?

Yes, "harm to research" is a correct and usable alternative. "Harm" and "damage" are often interchangeable in this context, although "damage" may suggest a more lasting or structural impact.

What kind of "damage to research" can occur?

Damage can be financial, reputational, or practical, affecting funding, public trust, data integrity, or the ability to conduct experiments. For instance, research misconduct can cause reputational damage, while funding cuts may lead to financial damage.