cross-referenced

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "cross-referenced" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the practice of checking or comparing information across different sources or documents to ensure accuracy or consistency. Example: "The data in this report has been cross-referenced with the latest research findings to validate the conclusions."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Too many cross-referenced clues for you?

The New York Times

They are cross-referenced and indexed.

The New Yorker

It's a database of recipes, cross-referenced with various allergies.

The Guardian - Tech

"Everything is constantly being rehashed and cross-referenced".

The New York Times

I checked our GPS coordinates on the satellite phone, and cross-referenced them with the map.

The Guardian

The footnotes, cross-referenced to other footnotes, are Ms. Horn's private thoughts about water.

The New York Times - Arts

They cross-referenced databases and proved a correlation between poverty and deaths linked to methadone.

The Guardian

The menus are cross-referenced by neighborhood, cuisine or even a particular dish.

The New York Times - Food

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

3 human-written examples

This was cross referenced with tweets mentioning the songs to ensure that the data was accurate.

The Guardian - Music

Panedia's Map service offers over 3500 panoramic tours cross referenced by Google Map.

TechCrunch

These findings were cross referenced with references from reviews.

BMC Psychiatry

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing technical documentation, meticulously "cross-reference" data points to bolster credibility and enhance user understanding.

Common error

Avoid excessive "cross-referencing" that disrupts the flow of your writing; prioritize clarity and conciseness by integrating essential information directly into the text whenever possible.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cross-referenced" primarily functions as a past participle or adjective, often modifying nouns to indicate a process of verification or comparison across multiple sources. As Ludwig AI explains, the phrase means that information is being validated by relating it to different sources.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

34%

News & Media

57%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Wiki

1%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "cross-referenced" is a commonly used phrase that functions as a past participle or adjective, primarily in neutral contexts such as news, science, and formal communications. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct, and usage examples demonstrate its role in ensuring accuracy and validating information by comparing it across multiple sources. While alternatives like "compared with" or "verified against" exist, "cross-referenced" specifically emphasizes the act of linking and validating data across different sources.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

verified with

Highlights the validation process using additional sources.

validated against

Stresses the act of confirming accuracy but might not indicate a direct comparison.

checked against

Emphasizes the verification aspect but may not fully convey the linking of information.

checked for consistency

Focuses on ensuring uniformity across different sources, potentially lacking the linking element.

compared with

Focuses on the act of comparing items, lacking the implication of linking or verifying information across sources.

reconciled with

Implies resolving discrepancies between sources to create a unified view.

correlated with

Suggests a mutual relationship or connection, potentially missing the direct comparison aspect.

compared and contrasted

Highlights both similarities and differences, going beyond a simple comparison.

collated with

Highlights the gathering and arranging of data for comparison, lacking the active verification component.

linked to

Focuses on the connection between items, possibly omitting the comparison or verification.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "cross-referenced" in a sentence?

Use "cross-referenced" to indicate that information has been checked against multiple sources for accuracy and consistency. For example, "The study's findings were "validated by" cross-referencing them with existing research."

What are some alternatives to using "cross-referenced"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "compared with", "verified against", or "checked against" as alternatives to "cross-referenced".

Is it more appropriate to say "cross-referenced with" or "cross-referenced to"?

"Cross-referenced with" is generally preferred when indicating the sources used for comparison, while "cross-referenced to" can be used to specify the item being linked or related. For example, data "cross-referenced with" another database versus data "cross-referenced to" a specific section.

What does it mean for data to be "cross-referenced"?

When data is "cross-referenced", it means that the information has been checked and compared across multiple sources to ensure accuracy, consistency, and reliability. This process helps to validate the data and identify any discrepancies. It is similar to saying the data was "validated by" or "verified with" other sources.