cross reference

USAGE SUMMARY

"cross reference" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used when you present an additional source, comparison, or reference that provides additional information related to the subject. For example, "According to the study, the average annual income for a teacher is $45,000; however, a cross reference of other recent studies reveals that income levels vary significantly by state."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

13 human-written examples

(6) cross reference provision.

Cornell University

(d), relating to cross reference.

Cornell University

(d), relating to cross reference, as (e).

Cornell University

2610, substituted "Cross references" for "Cross reference" in item 4484.

Cornell University

1298, made cross reference to other sections for additional exemptions.

Cornell University

Cross reference If you are doing a straightforward family tree, you will probably want to cross-reference everything one family member says against what the others have said.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

Cross-reference destinations.

The New York Times - Travel

§ 622.101 Cross-reference to procedures.

Cornell University

For a richer experience, cross-reference "B.Y. T.

The New York Times - Style

But there's no cross-reference point.

The Guardian - Sport

§ 261.1 Cross-reference to credit assistance.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "cross reference", ensure the connection between the items being referenced is clear and relevant to your overall point.

Common error

Avoid using "cross reference" excessively in a single piece of writing. Varied language enhances readability and prevents monotony.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "cross reference" functions primarily as a verb phrase, indicating an action of comparing or connecting different pieces of information. As Ludwig AI clarifies, it serves to present an additional source, comparison, or reference that offers supplementary details on a particular subject. This is supported by examples found in academic, news, and wiki contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Academia

30%

News & Media

40%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Science

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "cross reference" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed phrase that serves to connect disparate pieces of information. Ludwig AI highlights that its purpose is to provide supplementary material for enhanced comprehension. Predominantly found in academic, news, and wiki contexts, this phrase guides readers to related sources, supporting arguments through contextual connections. While versatile, it's crucial to use "cross reference" purposefully, ensuring the links are clear and relevant to avoid overuse. By mastering its nuances, you can enhance the clarity and credibility of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

check against

Emphasizes verifying information by comparing it with something else.

compare with

Focuses on the act of comparing two or more things.

verify against

Highlights the verification aspect through comparison.

correlate with

Suggests finding a mutual relationship or connection.

relate to

Indicates a connection or association between two things.

link to

Focuses on creating a link or connection to other material.

tie in with

Implies connecting disparate elements to create a unified whole.

draw a parallel

Emphasizes the similarities between two distinct subjects.

make a connection

Stresses creating a relationship or bond between different components.

allude to

Suggests referencing something indirectly or subtly.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "cross reference" in academic writing?

In academic writing, use "cross reference" to guide readers to other sections or sources that provide additional context or evidence. For example, "See Appendix A for a detailed methodology, and "refer to" Table 3 for supporting data".

What's a simpler way to say "cross reference" in casual conversation?

In informal settings, consider using phrases like "check with", "compare to", or "relate to" depending on the specific context. For instance, instead of "cross reference the documents", you could say "check the documents against each other".

Is it ever incorrect to use "cross reference"?

While "cross reference" is generally correct, it might be too formal for very informal communication. Also, ensure that the items you're cross-referencing are genuinely related and that the connection is clear to your audience. If the connection is tenuous, it's better to use a different phrasing like "related to".

What's the difference between "cross reference" and "cite"?

"Cite" typically refers to giving credit to a source, while "cross reference" refers to linking or comparing different pieces of information. For example, "cite the original study" gives credit, but "cross reference the study with recent findings" compares the study to new information.