criticized on

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "criticized on" is a valid and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used to introduce the topic of criticism or to explain what something is being criticized for. For example: "The report was widely criticized on its lack of data."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"I'm criticized on the one hand by social conservatives," he said.

The New York Times

Smith was criticized on The Fifth Down.

The New York Times

The Köppen classification has been criticized on many grounds.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Within hours, the ad was criticized on the Internet and by officials.

The New York Times

Maybe he'll talk about his youthful support for Sandinistas, which Mr. Lhota criticized on Monday.

The New York Times

However, the gruesome climax of the novel could be criticized on these grounds.

The New York Times - Books

Cov-lite borrowing raised alarms in 2007 and is again being criticized on similar grounds.

The New York Times

Several commeratives have been criticized on controversial grounds; the Quakers objecting to the depiction of Wm.

The New Yorker

The appointment was criticized on grounds that he had little experience in foreign affairs.

The New York Times - Arts

The government's handling of the matter has been criticized on a broad front.

The New York Times

Since the merger, Chrysler's profits have vanished, and the combination has been criticized on Wall Street.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "criticized on", be specific about the grounds for criticism. Clarity enhances the impact and credibility of your statement.

Common error

Avoid vague statements like "The policy was criticized on many things." Instead, specify what aspects of the policy faced criticism to provide a clearer understanding.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "criticized on" functions as a prepositional phrase that typically follows a passive verb construction. It serves to introduce the specific reason or grounds for which someone or something is being negatively evaluated. Ludwig AI confirms its valid usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Science

32%

Encyclopedias

7%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

4%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "criticized on" is a common and grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to specify the grounds for criticism. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and provides numerous examples across various domains. It's most frequently found in News & Media and Scientific contexts, indicating its widespread use in both formal and informal settings. To enhance clarity, specify the reasons for criticism rather than using vague generalizations. While alternatives like "condemned for" and "attacked for" exist, "criticized on" provides a neutral and precise way to convey negative evaluations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

faulted for

This implies a finding of error or responsibility for a mistake.

condemned for

This alternative carries a stronger negative connotation, implying moral disapproval.

denounced for

This suggests a public condemnation or strong disapproval.

blamed for

This indicates assigning responsibility for a negative outcome.

attacked for

This suggests a more aggressive and direct form of criticism.

chastised for

This implies a scolding or reprimand, often in a corrective manner.

reproached for

This suggests a formal expression of disapproval or disappointment.

scorned for

This implies a feeling of contempt or disdain.

slated for

Implies a harsh or severe criticism, often in a public forum.

panned for

This term is typically used in the context of artistic works such as movies, shows, or books.

FAQs

How do I use "criticized on" in a sentence?

Use "criticized on" to specify the basis or reason for the criticism. For example, "The study was "criticized on" its methodological flaws."

What are some alternatives to "criticized on"?

Alternatives include "condemned for", "attacked for", or "faulted for", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it more appropriate to use "criticized for" or "criticized on"?

Both "criticized for" and "criticized on" are acceptable. "Criticized for" is generally more common, but ""criticized on"" is suitable when specifying the grounds or basis of the criticism.

What's the difference between "criticized on" and "evaluated on"?

"Criticized on" implies a negative assessment, highlighting flaws or shortcomings. "Evaluated on", conversely, suggests a more neutral assessment based on specific criteria.