criteria of

USAGE SUMMARY

"criteria of" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when you want to refer to the standards or a set of rules by which something is judged. For example: "The professor outlined the criteria of success for the final exam."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Remember the criteria of public acceptance.

The New York Times

This mirrors the criteria of The Counted.

The Guardian

Harry fits all the criteria of a healthy London adolescent.

The Guardian

"But it fulfils [the award's] criteria of inventiveness and originality.

The Guardian - Books

"So we fit the criteria of a first suburb".

The New York Times

The basic criteria of unconditional love eluded me.

The New York Times

Other states have been quick to develop lists without determining the criteria of invasive species".

The New York Times

They wanted the projects to meet criteria of being "distinctly Belfast" and "inspiring communities".

The Guardian

Submissions will be reviewed on a criteria of skill, design, connection to the show and originality.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

They scored rigorously against the criteria of impact, innovation, collaboration, sustainability and transferability.

The Guardian

For example, the criteria of intentionality and repetition are often dropped.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "criteria of", ensure the noun it modifies is clearly defined and understood in the context. For instance, specify "criteria of success" or "criteria of eligibility".

Common error

Be careful to use the plural form "criteria" since it refers to a set of standards, not a single one. Avoid using "criterion of" when multiple criteria are being discussed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "criteria of" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase used to specify the standards, rules, or principles upon which a judgment or evaluation is based. This is supported by the various examples provided by Ludwig, which showcases its application in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "criteria of" is a grammatically sound and frequently used prepositional phrase that clarifies the standards or rules for judgment in various contexts. Analysis of numerous examples through Ludwig highlights its prevalence in News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business settings. When writing, remember to use the plural form "criteria" and ensure the noun it modifies is clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. Ludwig AI confirms the correctness of this phrase, making it a reliable choice for expressing the basis of evaluation or selection.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

standards for

Focuses on the benchmarks or levels that something must achieve.

requirements for

Highlights the necessary conditions or qualifications.

measures for

Emphasizes the methods or tools used for evaluation.

qualifications for

Specifies the attributes or skills needed to meet a certain condition.

guidelines for

Offers a set of recommendations or instructions.

benchmarks for

Stresses the points of reference against which something is measured.

yardstick for

Implies a standard used for comparison or judgment.

concerns of

Shifts the focus to issues or matters of importance to someone or something.

rules of

Emphasizes the governing principles or regulations.

thresholds of

Highlights the boundary or limit that needs to be crossed or met.

FAQs

How can I use "criteria of" in a sentence?

You can use "criteria of" to refer to the standards or rules by which something is judged. For instance: "The "criteria of success" for this project include innovation and impact."

What are some alternatives to "criteria of"?

Alternatives to "criteria of" include "standards for", "requirements for", or "measures for", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "criterion of" instead of "criteria of"?

"Criterion" is the singular form, while "criteria" is the plural. Use "criterion of" when referring to a single standard, and "criteria of" when referring to multiple standards.

What's the difference between "criteria of" and "guidelines for"?

"Criteria of" implies a set of specific standards that must be met, whereas "guidelines for" suggests recommendations or best practices to follow. The former is more rigid, while the latter is more flexible.